The development of mathematics itself is based upon empirical facts, so what? Your reasoning, examples, analogies sum up to nothing; you have failed to prove anything, yet I have given examples of (brilliant) people that think that mathematics is the foundations for programming (Dijkstra, Knuth, Stepanov, all of them computer scientists and mathematicians). Then there is Stepanov's work, Dijkstra's Discipline of Programming, and Knuth's The Art Of Computer Programming. These people devoted their lives to really grasp the foundations of things, you think they are just delusional academics and don't realize just what kind of idiot you are. These arguments doesn't even make you doubt about things. I'm not starting with G?del, Church, etc, because it would be a waste of time to trying to make you understand that things are not as simple as narrow as "OOP is humanitie's god" bullshit.
No announcement yet.
Shuttleworth On Mir: "A Fantastic Piece of Engineering"