Originally posted by cybertraveler
View Post
"It means the least amount of violence to get compliance, which is probably closer to what he actually meant.
While both "arresting after warnings" and "gunning down on sight" a suspect are technically violence, the former is the least amount of it."
Are you also presenting "jailing" as an example of a non-violence enforcement mechanism?
Example of what I'd call "violent" enforcement mechanisms are the good ol' beat-downs, physical torture, crippling (cutting hands/feet/body parts), forced isolation, and of course various kinds of ritual/spectacular executions.
If you are uncomfortable accepting the use of violence (or the threat of doing so) in the enforcement of these privacy laws
In practice though we all know it's better not to do that, as we can't usually trust the enforcers to be as just and fair as we are.
So restricting them to the least amount of violence is the safest bet to keep people as safe as possible in case they screw up.
Comment