Originally posted by starshipeleven
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
It Looks Like Intel Could Begin Pushing Graphics Tech More Seriously
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by dungeon View Post
When you look at these lines, what you think people wants? Only about 30% bying dGPUs? Nope, these are all together for AMD both dGPUs and APUs iGPUs also... you can be sure only about 25% maybe even less people so about that or less than 1/4 of the market buy any dGPUs
Intel eated about 20% of the market in just 5 years with these iGPU improvments Well, that is not a whole reason why....
I even think maybe max 20% of people need dGPUs today, as some percentage get laptop with additional dGPU even when they don't want these
Or if you like, there are stats for that too... dGPUs increasing but slowly.
That is about just PC Market share, that does not mean AMD can't make faster iGPUs, it is just that bussiness is also elsewhere - on gaming console market, these have fastest AMD iGPUs
Comment
-
Originally posted by duby229 View PostNo, you're wrong. It -IS- Intel's problem, because -in fact- that includes 75% of all computers. If you really think that 75% of all computers are not going to be gamed on,. then you sir are highly mistaken.
Most people need a PC to go on Internet, check mail, write documents. Welcome to the boring world of adults.
In fact it is that 75% that game developers are forced to try and target. And that is how Intel has harmed PC gaming.
Comment
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostThe proof is that any kind of benchmark done on Skylake that you can find on Google didn't detect any such issue.
Comment
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostFYI: most people that aren't teens don't game. Gamers are a vocal minority.
Most people need a PC to go on Internet, check mail, write documents. Welcome to the boring world of adults.
Please explain why pretty much any non-indie games refuse to work on Intel stuff or if they are light enough they work with quality reduced to bare minimum, because I was under the strong impression that PC gaming as a whole isn't giving a crap about them.
EDIT: https://www.engadget.com/2006/07/12/...ing-pc-gaming/
EDIT: And this moronic concept that adults don't game is completely retarded. Basically from my generation on up includes adult gamers.Last edited by duby229; 15 July 2017, 06:43 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by duby229 View PostYep, so you admmit freely that on every generation it is Intel's products that determine the bottom line? hmm? Even though it includes almost everything they have?
So knowing that Intel's market share is what it is, and that almost none of them are capable of adequate gaming, You are actually saying 75% of -ALL- computer users shouldn't game at all because they bought a computer that wasn't meant for gaming.....
Most people don't need to game, they go out, fuck each other, play stupid games like golf, go shooting at the range because they need to be able to use a rifle to defend themselves from... well, whatever their stupid fears are, and whatever.
Comment
-
Originally posted by duby229 View PostYou're wrong again. PC gaming as a whole weakened considerably about a decade ago, and it was -because- of Intel's GPU hurting sales.
EDIT: https://www.engadget.com/2006/07/12/...ing-pc-gaming/
Comment
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostNo, I did not say that.
Come on, stop this, we get you are butthurt because you can't game on your PC.
Most people don't need to game, they go out, fuck each other, play stupid games like golf, go shooting at the range because they need to be able to use a rifle to defend themselves from... well, whatever their stupid fears are, and whatever.
Comment
Comment