Originally posted by andrei_me
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Intel Core i9 7900X Linux Benchmarks
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by glock24 View PostWhy such a big difference between the Ryzen 1700 and 1800X in the Blender and (specially) the Rodinia tests? Some error? They are close in most benchmarks, but not in these.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
All I takeaway from this is that Intel has purposely been shelving their next iterations in order to maximize profits on current upgrades while the competition catches up.
Not surprising since in their early days they did the same thing.
Any company that is willing to withhold good from the consumer just to milk them more is naughty in my book. All the more reason to go AM4 for my next build.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Interestingly, if you normalize the results by the CPUs' operating frequency (and core count in MP tests) AMD's and Intel's architectures perform quite similarly. AMD just doesn't seem to reach frequencies quite as high. Then again, the power draw is less to make up for it.
As a CPU for all workloads, the 7900X is probably the better pick (not considering the price) since it boosts its frequency much higher in ST workloads. But this is probably not the reason to get a 10C CPU...
- Likes 2
Comment
-
How about adding the apache static server:
OpenBenchmarking.org, Phoronix Test Suite, Linux benchmarking, automated benchmarking, benchmarking results, benchmarking repository, open source benchmarking, benchmarking test profiles
and check if the core count scales properly? Probably worth the money (compared to the 1800x) in a simple scenario?
Comment
Comment