The message from intel seems clear: They consider Linux a second class citizen. If you just need normal desktop functionality, intel graphics may be fine. But Linux users who want the best graphics performance had better choose nvidia.
Intel Skylake Graphics: Windows 10 vs. Ubuntu 16.04 + Latest Open-Source Driver Code
Collapse
X
-
Interesting that on stock Ubuntu 16.04 with a Toshiba Z20t-C-121 Skylake (Core m7 6y75 GT 515, rather the same as the used GT 530 despite on a few MHz, the CPU being a lot weaker (dual core with 1,2 GHz + 3,1 GHz turbo), I got way better results with stock GpuTest 0.7.0 (http://www.ozone3d.net/gpudb/score.php?which=276333 : 4745 vs 3777, http://www.ozone3d.net/gpudb/score.php?which=276334: 235 vs. 216, http://www.ozone3d.net/gpudb/score.php?which=276335: 16772 vs. 6953, http://www.ozone3d.net/gpudb/score.php?which=276336: 71 vs. 38, http://www.ozone3d.net/gpudb/score.php?which=276339: 201 vs. 101.
Comment
-
-
Well, The Talos Priciple is benchmarked on low and mesa drivers usualy play comparable or better on low
And when you enable more effects like with Xonotic which is benchamrked on High/Ultra... then you also have enabled mblur, bloom, occlude, etc... and that is slow with mesa
edit: i did not checked right now but i know this from earlier, so generaly some effects can be utterly slower with mesa.Last edited by dungeon; 24 June 2016, 04:30 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by david_lynch View PostThe message from intel seems clear: They consider Linux a second class citizen. If you just need normal desktop functionality, intel graphics may be fine. But Linux users who want the best graphics performance had better choose nvidia.
Comment
-
-
Michael, wondering if you could provide/point to some Skylake Iris Graphics 540 or Iris Graphics 550 Phoronix performance benchmarks? These higher end Skylake GPUs are starting to appear in a few ultrabooks and of course the Skylake-based NUCs as well. I recall you were looking to get your hands on one of the NUCs a while back, any success?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mifritscher View PostInteresting that on stock Ubuntu 16.04 with a Toshiba Z20t-C-121 Skylake (Core m7 6y75 GT 515, rather the same as the used GT 530 despite on a few MHz, the CPU being a lot weaker (dual core with 1,2 GHz + 3,1 GHz turbo), I got way better results with stock GpuTest 0.7.0 (http://www.ozone3d.net/gpudb/score.php?which=276333 : 4745 vs 3777, http://www.ozone3d.net/gpudb/score.php?which=276334: 235 vs. 216, http://www.ozone3d.net/gpudb/score.php?which=276335: 16772 vs. 6953, http://www.ozone3d.net/gpudb/score.php?which=276336: 71 vs. 38, http://www.ozone3d.net/gpudb/score.php?which=276339: 201 vs. 101.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by rhysk View PostMichael, wondering if you could provide/point to some Skylake Iris Graphics 540 or Iris Graphics 550 Phoronix performance benchmarks? These higher end Skylake GPUs are starting to appear in a few ultrabooks and of course the Skylake-based NUCs as well. I recall you were looking to get your hands on one of the NUCs a while back, any success?Michael Larabel
https://www.michaellarabel.com/
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by bug77 View Post
Not necessarily second class citizen, but Intel's IGPs were never meant for gaming. As long as the drivers don't crash, their job is pretty much done.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Qaridariumare you willing to share your "Interesting analysis" ? or do you wait for another person to get the point?Test signature
Comment
-
Comment