Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Intel Graphics Performance: Clear Linux vs. Xubuntu 16.04 LTS vs. Fedora 23 Xfce

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • cj.wijtmans
    replied
    ubuntu becoming more irrelevant each day. No wonder they team with microsoft.

    Leave a comment:


  • DIRT
    replied
    Originally posted by chimpy View Post

    I don't know what you're talking about, there aren't any Debian + xfce fanatics in the Phoronix forums . . . . oh wait a second

    Xfce is better compared to kde and you are not allowed to have a different opinion than me. /sarcasm

    Seriously though I still think kde has too much going on its to big and complexed. Maybe its kubuntu, but I keep finding bugs that hurt usability. 16.04 shipped with broken widgets, and they been broken for over a month in the dailybuilds. How did it not get fixed? Idono.

    edit: I just realizes that was very specific. Oh god I'm one of them now...
    Last edited by DIRT; 05 May 2016, 03:15 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Delgarde
    replied
    Originally posted by debianxfce View Post
    It is not fun to write shit to the Internet, you only make yourself look a fool.
    We whole-heartedly agree...

    Leave a comment:


  • willmore
    replied
    I wish I could claim some kind of knowledge about how performant F23/XFCE were, but I was happily surprised to find my environment perform so well in this testing. Yay?

    Leave a comment:


  • andre30correia
    replied
    use ubuntu unity and not xubuntu, double fps

    Leave a comment:


  • AsuMagic
    replied
    Originally posted by debianxfce View Post

    It is not fun to write shit to the Internet, you only make yourself look a fool.
    http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/...o-airlock.html
    In what it is an argument? Oh, welp then : Google uses Ubuntu, anything else must be terrible if they don't use it!
    Also, in a lot of those benchmarks, stable ubuntu has better performance than Debian stable (Testing repos is not really meant for everyone).

    Keep off your fanatism out of the internet. Harrass your neighbor so they use Debian + XFCE, no need to bother the whole internet with it. Don't worry, we're smart enough to make choices.

    Leave a comment:


  • axfelix
    replied
    You're right, that does work! I was grepping in the wrong xorg log to check if it was enabled

    Leave a comment:


  • Mystro256
    replied
    Originally posted by chimpy View Post

    I don't know what you're talking about, there aren't any Debian + xfce fanatics in the Phoronix forums . . . . oh wait a second
    Haha yes, speak of the devil

    Leave a comment:


  • Dick Palmer
    replied
    Michael, Any chance you could add a plain Ubuntu to the follow-up?

    Leave a comment:


  • balouba
    replied
    Originally posted by axfelix View Post
    So it seems like most of these incredible Clear Linux advantages are just down to using DRI3 for Intel? I guess I should finally get around to ripping out xf86-video-intel on my Arch machine and switching to modesetting/glamor like all of the cool kids are doing, though I wish there were an easier way...
    This is Arch, all stock..:

    Code:
    Section "Device"
            Identifier "Intel Graphics"
            Driver "intel"
    [...]
            Option      "DRI"    "3"
    EndSection

    Code:
    [    18.749] (II) intel(0): direct rendering: DRI2 DRI3 enabled
    [    18.749] (II) intel(0): hardware support for Present enabled

    Code:
    extra/xf86-video-intel 1:2.99.917+641+ge4ef6e9-1 (xorg-drivers xorg) [installed]

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X