Intel Turns On Kabylake For Mesa, Libdrm

[GreatEmerald]

Isn't English great?

What he probably meant is "Intel Enables Kabylake for Mesa and Libdrm", since your sentence seems to imply that the hardware needs to be modified to work with mesa and libdrm, rather than the other way around.

And that change doesn't even help! It still sounds like the subject is Kabylake. So it would have to be "Intel Enables Kabylake Support in Mesa and Libdrm" or "Intel Turns Kabylake Support on in Mesa and Libdrm".

[Kano]

I would like to see some commits here:

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/vaapi/intel-driver

Especially here:

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/vaapi/in..._device_info.c

The first lowend Atom "Broxton" which are based on Skylake/Kabylake are already mentioned to support HEVC 10 bit...

[crymsonpheonix]

All these organisations turning against their own technology, it's terrible!
Or you might have meant "Intel Turns Kabylake On For Mesa, Libdrm".

Isn't English great?

What he probably meant is "Intel Enables Kabylake for Mesa and Libdrm", since your sentence seems to imply that the hardware needs to be modified to work with mesa and libdrm, rather than the other way around.

[GreatEmerald]

All these organisations turning against their own technology, it's terrible!
Or you might have meant "Intel Turns Kabylake On For Mesa, Libdrm".

[phoronix]

Phoronix: Intel Turns On Kabylake For Mesa, Libdrm

Intel has committed all of the PCI IDs to Mesa and libdrm for the graphics processors of their next-generation Kabylake hardware...

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...ylake-IDs-Mesa