Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Intel Is Working On Miracast (HDMI Over Wireless) For Linux

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    An initial idea was to do everything in user-space by redirecting the ioctls to user-space, but concerns were raised over implementing too much and allowing proprietary graphics drivers to be implemented in user-space atop any new interfaces from this work.
    What? Can someone explain this?

    Comment


    • #12
      Miracast? Where is Widi support in Linux, Intel?

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by M@GOid View Post
        Miracast? Where is Widi support in Linux, Intel?
        Widi and Miracast are one and the same thing.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by schmidtbag View Post
          Well keep in mind it's probably heavily compressed. Doing uncompressed HD video over wifi, as you stated, just isn't realistic.
          I take it you haven't heard of 802.11ad
          Unfortunately given our atmosphere it has a rather short range (iirc, only a few, very few, meters).
          802.11ac can, theoretically, support something like 5gb (with enough antennas and radios).

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by liam View Post
            I take it you haven't heard of 802.11ad
            Unfortunately given our atmosphere it has a rather short range (iirc, only a few, very few, meters).
            802.11ac can, theoretically, support something like 5gb (with enough antennas and radios).
            True but keep in mind for every additional device you add to the network you're dividing the bandwidth, and not many devices are ad (or ac) compatible. With something like Miracast, I think the original intention was an ad-hoc connection, so you could probably get by with n speeds with some compression. Remember too that just because you can stream 5gbp/s, it doesn't mean the receiving device can interpret all of that. Compressed data can sometimes be easier to work with, albeit with poorer latency.

            Comment


            • #16
              How about make it work in Windows first? Buggy unusable PoS.

              Comment


              • #17
                There's solutions for if you're bleeding money, and for if you just have a lot to throw around.
                There are also some less expensive access points, if you already have an ethernet solution in place.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Nobu View Post
                  There's solutions for if you're bleeding money, and for if you just have a lot to throw around.
                  That would go great in my 8-TV infotainment system that's set up in 3 of my 4 Range Rovers!

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by blubbaer View Post


                    Miracast isn't really HDMI over Wifi. I would describe it as MP4 over Wifi. The audio and video data is compressed with H.264 and AAC and the container format is adapted for Wifi.
                    Too bad, it's proprietary then.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X