Linux 4.1 Power Consumption Appears To Improve For Intel Users

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • phoronix
    Administrator
    • Jan 2007
    • 67121

    Linux 4.1 Power Consumption Appears To Improve For Intel Users

    Phoronix: Linux 4.1 Power Consumption Appears To Improve For Intel Users

    A Red Hat developer mentioned to us at Phoronix that they're seeing "drastically improved battery life" in some cases with the Linux 4.1 kernel to the extent that it's up to 2~4 hours of extra battery life with the kernel upgrade to Git. I've since started some fresh Linux laptop battery tests.

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
  • saski
    Phoronix Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 57

    #2
    Are Matthew Garrett's Patches to reduce power drain by using smater SATA ALPM already included in 4.1?

    That would explain for the drop in power consumption.

    Comment

    • edoantonioco
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2013
      • 489

      #3
      and what about power improvements for amd hardware?

      Comment

      • kokoko3k
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2011
        • 301

        #4
        It would be nice to know which cpus (?), chipsets (?) are affected by the change.
        Any link to read further?


        Comment

        • curaga
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2008
          • 5924

          #5
          For the last cases 3.19 had the best numbers...

          Comment

          • Gusar
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2012
            • 1337

            #6
            Originally posted by saski View Post
            Are Matthew Garrett's Patches to reduce power drain by using smater SATA ALPM already included in 4.1?

            That would explain for the drop in power consumption.
            Nope, not included yet. Once they are, a test using different sata link policies (max_performance, firmware_defaults, medium_power) would be interesting.

            Comment

            • dungeon
              Banned
              • Feb 2008
              • 7915

              #7
              Originally posted by curaga View Post
              For the last cases 3.19 had the best numbers...
              And in xonotic it actually underperform. Iris 5100 should be faster then HD 5500, but here it is not the case... It is something like 40% for what I would expect from that Iris.

              Comment

              • Azrael5
                Senior Member
                • Jul 2012
                • 1954

                #8
                Excellent news. Is it possible to get a minor consumption on desktop!?

                Comment

                • misp
                  Phoronix Member
                  • Oct 2013
                  • 89

                  #9
                  What about comparison with Windows?

                  Comment

                  • kernelOfTruth
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2009
                    • 737

                    #10
                    Originally posted by saski View Post
                    Are Matthew Garrett's Patches to reduce power drain by using smater SATA ALPM already included in 4.1?

                    That would explain for the drop in power consumption.

                    working fine here on 3.19.7

                    if anyone wants to try them out:

                    Linux kernel source tree. Contribute to kernelOfTruth/linux development by creating an account on GitHub.


                    Code:
                    for i in /sys/class/scsi_host/host*; do
                             /bin/echo "medium_power" >  $i/link_power_management_policy
                    done

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X