Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

More Intel Skylake Graphics PCI IDs Get Revealed

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • More Intel Skylake Graphics PCI IDs Get Revealed

    Phoronix: More Intel Skylake Graphics PCI IDs Get Revealed

    Intel's open-source Linux development crew continues working on next-generation Skylake hardware support in a steadfast manner...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Intel Graphics are a Joke, please use it on some review to compare against even onboard graphics (nvidia 8100/radeon hd 3000 or newer). Or against low profile cards like gts 410/420 or something like that... Soo everybody will laught of intel.

    Comment


    • #3
      Intel has very nice video hardware accelleration including encoding (not for Atom/Celeron/Pentium) support via vaapi. vainfo even reports:
      Code:
            VAProfileH264MultiviewHigh      : VAEntrypointEncSlice
            VAProfileH264MultiviewHigh      : VAEntrypointVLD
      which stands for H264 MVC which is used by 3d BluRays in the SSIF subfolder (suffix ssif). I still don't know how to play those files, but at least I know it would be accellerated.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Kano View Post
        Intel has very nice video hardware accelleration including encoding (not for Atom/Celeron/Pentium) support via vaapi.
        Depends on which Atom/Celeron/Pentium you're talking about. Baytrail based ones have fully functional vaapi support. Multiview isn't there, but the rest is. This is on my Celeron N2806 netbook:
        Code:
        libva info: VA-API version 0.37.0
        libva info: va_getDriverName() returns 0
        libva info: Trying to open /usr/lib/dri/i965_drv_video.so
        libva info: Found init function __vaDriverInit_0_37
        libva info: va_openDriver() returns 0
        vainfo: VA-API version: 0.37 (libva 1.5.0)
        vainfo: Driver version: Intel i965 driver for Intel(R) Bay Trail - 1.5.0
        vainfo: Supported profile and entrypoints
              VAProfileMPEG2Simple            : VAEntrypointVLD
              VAProfileMPEG2Simple            : VAEntrypointEncSlice
              VAProfileMPEG2Main              : VAEntrypointVLD
              VAProfileMPEG2Main              : VAEntrypointEncSlice
              VAProfileH264ConstrainedBaseline: VAEntrypointVLD
              VAProfileH264ConstrainedBaseline: VAEntrypointEncSlice
              VAProfileH264Main               : VAEntrypointVLD
              VAProfileH264Main               : VAEntrypointEncSlice
              VAProfileH264High               : VAEntrypointVLD
              VAProfileH264High               : VAEntrypointEncSlice
              VAProfileH264StereoHigh         : VAEntrypointVLD
              VAProfileVC1Simple              : VAEntrypointVLD
              VAProfileVC1Main                : VAEntrypointVLD
              VAProfileVC1Advanced            : VAEntrypointVLD
              VAProfileNone                   : VAEntrypointVideoProc
              VAProfileJPEGBaseline           : VAEntrypointVLD

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by cocklover View Post
          Intel Graphics are a Joke, please use it on some review to compare against even onboard graphics (nvidia 8100/radeon hd 3000 or newer). Or against low profile cards like gts 410/420 or something like that... Soo everybody will laught of intel.
          Xonotic Ultra - Linux/Windows
          Intel Iris Pro 5200 - 132/164 fps
          AMD 7850K - 57/61 fps
          Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

          Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
          Last edited by JS987; 16 March 2015, 12:27 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by cocklover View Post
            Intel Graphics are a Joke, please use it on some review to compare against even onboard graphics (nvidia 8100/radeon hd 3000 or newer). Or against low profile cards like gts 410/420 or something like that... Soo everybody will laught of intel.
            Who cares -- unless you're devoted to Linux games.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by JS987 View Post
              Xonotic Ultra - Linux/Windows
              Intel Iris Pro 5200 - 132/164 fps
              AMD 7850K - 57/61 fps
              Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

              http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...i_linwin&num=3
              Careful using radeonsi benchmarks as reference for hardware performance, driver isnt any where near the level of support / speed as r600g

              *radeonsi user*
              All opinions are my own not those of my employer if you know who they are.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Ericg View Post
                Careful using radeonsi benchmarks as reference for hardware performance, driver isnt any where near the level of support / speed as r600g

                *radeonsi user*
                Those results are with fglrx.
                Newer results: 65 fps Mesa, 82 fps fglrx
                Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by JS987 View Post
                  Those results are with fglrx.
                  Newer results: 65 fps Mesa, 82 fps fglrx
                  http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...ri_omega&num=4
                  Whoopsies, my bad.

                  Couldn't get the article to load so I just assumed you had linked radeonsi benches for AMD. My mistake.
                  All opinions are my own not those of my employer if you know who they are.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Hopefully Skylake at least will support Vulkan, even if not out of the gate. Although ideally it should be from Haswell and up.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X