Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

More Intel Skylake Graphics PCI IDs Get Revealed

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • More Intel Skylake Graphics PCI IDs Get Revealed

    Phoronix: More Intel Skylake Graphics PCI IDs Get Revealed

    Intel's open-source Linux development crew continues working on next-generation Skylake hardware support in a steadfast manner...

    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...kylake-PCI-IDs

  • #2
    Intel Graphics are a Joke, please use it on some review to compare against even onboard graphics (nvidia 8100/radeon hd 3000 or newer). Or against low profile cards like gts 410/420 or something like that... Soo everybody will laught of intel.

    Comment


    • #3
      Intel has very nice video hardware accelleration including encoding (not for Atom/Celeron/Pentium) support via vaapi. vainfo even reports:
      Code:
            VAProfileH264MultiviewHigh      : VAEntrypointEncSlice
            VAProfileH264MultiviewHigh      : VAEntrypointVLD
      which stands for H264 MVC which is used by 3d BluRays in the SSIF subfolder (suffix ssif). I still don't know how to play those files, but at least I know it would be accellerated.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Kano View Post
        Intel has very nice video hardware accelleration including encoding (not for Atom/Celeron/Pentium) support via vaapi.
        Depends on which Atom/Celeron/Pentium you're talking about. Baytrail based ones have fully functional vaapi support. Multiview isn't there, but the rest is. This is on my Celeron N2806 netbook:
        Code:
        libva info: VA-API version 0.37.0
        libva info: va_getDriverName() returns 0
        libva info: Trying to open /usr/lib/dri/i965_drv_video.so
        libva info: Found init function __vaDriverInit_0_37
        libva info: va_openDriver() returns 0
        vainfo: VA-API version: 0.37 (libva 1.5.0)
        vainfo: Driver version: Intel i965 driver for Intel(R) Bay Trail - 1.5.0
        vainfo: Supported profile and entrypoints
              VAProfileMPEG2Simple            : VAEntrypointVLD
              VAProfileMPEG2Simple            : VAEntrypointEncSlice
              VAProfileMPEG2Main              : VAEntrypointVLD
              VAProfileMPEG2Main              : VAEntrypointEncSlice
              VAProfileH264ConstrainedBaseline: VAEntrypointVLD
              VAProfileH264ConstrainedBaseline: VAEntrypointEncSlice
              VAProfileH264Main               : VAEntrypointVLD
              VAProfileH264Main               : VAEntrypointEncSlice
              VAProfileH264High               : VAEntrypointVLD
              VAProfileH264High               : VAEntrypointEncSlice
              VAProfileH264StereoHigh         : VAEntrypointVLD
              VAProfileVC1Simple              : VAEntrypointVLD
              VAProfileVC1Main                : VAEntrypointVLD
              VAProfileVC1Advanced            : VAEntrypointVLD
              VAProfileNone                   : VAEntrypointVideoProc
              VAProfileJPEGBaseline           : VAEntrypointVLD

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by cocklover View Post
          Intel Graphics are a Joke, please use it on some review to compare against even onboard graphics (nvidia 8100/radeon hd 3000 or newer). Or against low profile cards like gts 410/420 or something like that... Soo everybody will laught of intel.
          Xonotic Ultra - Linux/Windows
          Intel Iris Pro 5200 - 132/164 fps
          AMD 7850K - 57/61 fps
          http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...in8redux&num=2
          http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...i_linwin&num=3
          Last edited by JS987; 03-16-2015, 12:27 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by cocklover View Post
            Intel Graphics are a Joke, please use it on some review to compare against even onboard graphics (nvidia 8100/radeon hd 3000 or newer). Or against low profile cards like gts 410/420 or something like that... Soo everybody will laught of intel.
            Who cares -- unless you're devoted to Linux games.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by JS987 View Post
              Xonotic Ultra - Linux/Windows
              Intel Iris Pro 5200 - 132/164 fps
              AMD 7850K - 57/61 fps
              http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...in8redux&num=2
              http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...i_linwin&num=3
              Careful using radeonsi benchmarks as reference for hardware performance, driver isnt any where near the level of support / speed as r600g

              *radeonsi user*

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Ericg View Post
                Careful using radeonsi benchmarks as reference for hardware performance, driver isnt any where near the level of support / speed as r600g

                *radeonsi user*
                Those results are with fglrx.
                Newer results: 65 fps Mesa, 82 fps fglrx
                http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...ri_omega&num=4

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by JS987 View Post
                  Those results are with fglrx.
                  Newer results: 65 fps Mesa, 82 fps fglrx
                  http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...ri_omega&num=4
                  Whoopsies, my bad.

                  Couldn't get the article to load so I just assumed you had linked radeonsi benches for AMD. My mistake.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Hopefully Skylake at least will support Vulkan, even if not out of the gate. Although ideally it should be from Haswell and up.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X