Originally posted by fakeJap
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
KDE 4.11 Haswell Desktop Effects Performance
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by dee. View PostWhich again is a whole lot of bullshit, with no evidence of anything ever functioning that way. Since the homeopathic nutcases seem to believe "the more you dilute, the more potent it becomes", they dilute their liquids so much that it ends up as nothing but water, with a stray molecule floating around in some doses.
Originally posted by dee. View PostTry learning the meaning of the word "strawman".
Aka exactly what you were doing.
Originally posted by dee. View PostMassage as such doesn't belong in the list, as it has demonstrable benefits. When used therapeutically as part of medical treatment, it is usually called "physiotherapy". It is not alternate medicine, as it is recognized as a working treatment, whose efficacy is backed by evidence. As long as you stay with actual massage and don't go into chiropractic quackery...
Originally posted by dee. View PostHerbalism is a vague term which you need to define. Many people who are into alt-med quackery fall into the naturalistic fallacy: Just because something exists in nature does not make it good or beneficial: cyanide exists in nature, and it's very deadly for you. (Although one form of vitamin B-12 contains small amounts of it.) The entire dichotomy between natural/unnatural chemicals is entirely artificial, and I'll tell you why.
Originally posted by dee. View Post
That is because willow bark contains salicylic acid, and aspirin is acetylated salicylic acid. There's a hydroxyl group on salicylic acid which forms an ester with acetic acid, forming acetyl salicylic acid.
Originally posted by dee. View PostBig surprise! Many chemicals have precursors that come from plants etc. In fact, ALL chemicals have precursors that come from nature! No chemicals are synthesized by waving a magic wand and making "chemicals" appear from thin air! Ergo: ALL chemicals are natural!
Many chemicals have precursors that come from plants etc.
Originally posted by dee. View PostFor that matter, many herbs also contain chemicals that are inconvenient or impossible to take in their natural form, either because the rest of the plant is poisonous or otherwise harmful, or because the concentrations are so small that it's not feasible without heavy distillation, or because the rest of the plant has some other non-desirable side effects. In many cases, we can, with science and chemistry, even improve the chemicals found in plants (or animals or fungi or microbial life).
Originally posted by dee. View PostHaha, no, you dork. Surgeons wash their equipment and hands to keep the bacteria etc. in them from entering the wounds and infecting the patient. Nothing whatsoever to do with homeopathy.
Originally posted by dee. View PostNope, no strawman. Once again, learn what the term means. I suggest wikipedia:
Originally posted by dee. View PostAnd yes, this thing is still things going on - thousands of endangered animals are getting killed, in fact some species are endangered because of these superstitious beliefs. The mentality behind an asian man wanting to treat his lacking erection by eating a tiger's gallbladder is exactly the same as someone who buys "homeopathic remedies" and wears magnetic bracelets and healing crystals...
Originally posted by dee. View PostEasy for you to say when you don't have cancer. And the thing is, Steve Jobs didn't say "oh, I don't want to go through all those treatments, I'd rather live what life I have left comfortably". He didn't refuse treatments to choose to be with his family, or job, or anything. No, he refused medical treatment, because he believed in alternate medicine, like homeopathy, miracle diets and such. He didn't say "ok I know I'm going to die but I'm ok with it", he wanted to be cured, but he was convinced that he could beat cancer by only using "alternate medicine".
Originally posted by dee. View PostLater on, when the quackery wasn't working, Jobs went to get medical treatment, but it was too late by then. So it wasn't a question of not wanting to go through the treatment, it was a question of putting your faith in quackery, then coming to your senses too late and paying the price.
And yes, cancer treatment is imperfect currently, there's a chance it won't work, there's a chance the cancer can come back later... but you know what, it is the best we have - it certainly works infinitely better than alt-med quack treatments. You know what else? You know how cancer treatments are advancing all the time, how we're making big advances constantly on finding new and better ways to cure cancer - those advances are all made thanks to evidence-based medical science. Not homeopathy, naturopathy, healing crystals, astrology or alchemy...
Originally posted by dee. View Post
Again, define what you mean by "herbalism".
Originally posted by dee. View PostBig news! All chemicals are derived from nature in some way. Of course, we look for new chemicals in nature. The difference between pharmaceutical chemicals and traditional herbal medicine is that the traditional medicine is a trial-and-error thing, it's based on tradition and folklore: some herb may be known as a "cure" for some illness, and it may actually work, or it may be a placebo, or it may work but also be harmful in other ways - they don't know. Because it takes medical science, pharmaceutical chemistry, neurochemistry, biochemistry, etc. to actually figure these things out, how they actually function, and which chemical (if any) in the plant (most contain hundreds) is the active ingredient responsible for the desired effect.
Originally posted by dee. View PostWhich is an electric field and has nothing to do with any quackery concept of "vital energy".
There's energy everywhere. E=mc^2. Light is energy, motion is energy, heat is energy, sound is energy... everything in existence has some kind of energy. But none of these are the "vital energy" that is described in quackery.
Originally posted by dee. View PostNo, if you're actually intelligent you'll see that that is all a huge load of bullcrap.
Originally posted by dee. View PostOoh, you use peppermint to treat stomachaches and everyone knows that peppermint works for stomachaches: wow! Now that obviously means that all the rest of the stuff that they do must be correct too, right?
Originally posted by dee. View PostNope. That's a common strategy used by nutcases, religious zealots and the like, when they don't have any actual evidence or rational arguments to back up their views (ie. always). It's the same when the Jehova's witnesses want to convert you, they use arguments like this: "look, the bible says 'don't kill', and obviously we all know killing is bad. So since the bible is right about that, all the other stuff must be right as well!"
Originally posted by dee. View PostNo one has said anything about columbus. Flat earth was a myth believed by common people during various times in (pre-)history.
Originally posted by dee. View PostNo. The way it works is that nothing can be 100% certain. In practice however, the distinction between 99,9999% and 100% is merely academic. Since we have to draw the line somewhere, we have to accept that 99,999...% certainty as certain in practice. Which is what is actually done. We know with 99,999...% certainty that the earth is not flat. The error margin in that statement comes from things like, we might be living in a computer simulation in which case it would be impossible to say what anything is really. So mostly just philosophical things that have no real effect on anything.
Originally posted by dee. View PostThat doesn't mean that nothing can be disproven. Things can be disproven and are, constantly. When a hypothesis makes predictions which do not match the observed evidence, the hypothesis is disproven, plain and simple. You don't seem to understand a fundamental distinction here: proving and disproving are entirely different things. We disprove things constantly, that's how science works, how theories get advanced.
Originally posted by dee. View PostThe fact that we might get new knowledge in the future does not give you a free pass to dismiss all current knowledge. That's not how it works. What is known now is the best knowledge we currently have, and that's what we have to go by for now, until(if) better knowledge appears. If you disagree with some part of it, the burden is on your to show it false, or present a better hypothesis. You can't just assume, "well it'll be proven false in the future anyway so I don't have to believe it". That's putting the cart before the horse.
Originally posted by dee. View PostOk, you obviously have no idea what you're talking about.
Originally posted by dee. View PostThe idea that nothing is 100% certain does not mean that every possibility is equally probable. And actually, absence of evidence can be, in many cases, taken as evidence of absence - particularly, in cases where the claim is unfalsifiable. Furthermore, as it's not possible to prove the negative, the burden of proof is on the one making the claim. That is, if you're claiming that naturopathy has health effects, or that the body contains some kind of magical energy field that somehow reacts beneficently with naturopathic medicines(tm), now only $5 a bottle, or something... then you're making a positive claim and it's up to you to provide evidence for that claim, not for others to disprove it.
Also naturopathic medicine as a school can't come in a bottle as the nature of it is a holistic examination of your life and how you can work to support the body, and I didn't know that eating right, releasing stress and trying to be non-destructive towards your body is somehow such an oh so bad idea, I should totally eat mcdonalds every day, stress myself all the hell out and intentionally pound my body with harsh chemicals yeah! Seriously though even if you don't agree with the ideas you would at least agree that the three underlying principles are good ideas yes?Last edited by Luke_Wolf; 24 October 2013, 04:28 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by fakeJap View Posti wonder why western people despise homeopathy this much.. from where i come, we have big universities and colleges teaching only homeopathy. i dont think they are teaching about "memory of water" there for all these years..
- not work 'in clinical tests).
- result in some solutions with exactly zero active molecules in them (zero, none, just water).
Let's rewrite it differently:
- Nobody has any idea why it should even work;
- Nobody has ever shown that it worked indeed.
I don't know what they teach in these big universities and colleges from where you come, but the end product does not and has never worked (which is, again, proven in repeatable and repeated experiments in many countries around the world).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Luke_Wolf View Postwall of text
It's just that, the fact that something of a given field works does not mean that the whole field is sound and working too.
And also a bit of the fact that something which has not been shown to work should not be relied on as protection against anything (saint amulets to protect you against road accident, incantations and magic to improve your grades at school, etc...) (well, feel free to use them, but DO NOT tell people it works)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Luke_Wolf View Postand that's why I have issues with it
Strawman: taking the extreme of an idea an going to argumentum ad absurdum in order to befuddle the point and knock down an idea that you try to portray the other individual as pushing
Aka exactly what you were doing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by erendorn View PostAgain, nobody has any issues with anything that has been proven to work.
Comment
-
Originally posted by tomtomme View Postloooool - have you guys ever heard about something that is called offtopic?
I thought I could learn soemthing about kde4.11 performance on haswell here....
Probably inside some medic-ish forum there are people busy to discuss about compositing and windows manager, who knows, maybe they are discussing about KDE 4.11 perfomance on haswell right now...
Comment
Comment