Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Intel Iris Pro 5200 Graphics
Collapse
X
-
I thought you had one of the 65W ones, 5600K or something like that. Perhaps my memory is faulty.
-
Originally posted by Caledar View PostCan we have graphs of the same performance tests comparing the iris pro to the i7 3rd generation and 2nd generation?
Leave a comment:
-
Can we have graphs of the same performance tests comparing the iris pro to the i7 3rd generation and 2nd generation?
Leave a comment:
-
We don't know that yet, do we? Linux results often differ from Windows ones.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by curaga View PostMichael, don't forget to compare to all AMD APUs at your disposal.
Leave a comment:
-
i want to see this vs a nvidia gtx 640M i think once the intel drivers are up to the windows level they will be around the same speed
Leave a comment:
-
YES!!!
Originally posted by Cyborg16 View PostAs far as I've heard, it's a general-purpose cache. Would be interesting to hear more about how it affects performance (e.g. by comparing to a similar CPU without eDRAM).
That's exactly it for me... Run a haswell with just a text console as a server and see how much that eDRAM helps vs the same CPU without when running various workloads. PostgreSQL anyone?
Leave a comment:
-
Looking forward to the review and benchmarks! Might I also suggest doing power draw tests with different kernels as well as battery life tests, given that this is meant to be an "ultrabook".
Thanks!
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: