Intel & Canonical Collaborate On Graphics Preview Stack For Ubuntu 24.10

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • phoronix
    Administrator
    • Jan 2007
    • 67050

    Intel & Canonical Collaborate On Graphics Preview Stack For Ubuntu 24.10

    Phoronix: Intel & Canonical Collaborate On Graphics Preview Stack For Ubuntu 24.10

    Intel and Canonical have been collaborating to provide an early "Graphics Preview" stack for Ubuntu 24.10 to provide better support for the new Intel Core Ultra Series 2 "Lunar Lake" and Intel Arc B-Series "Battlemage" graphics...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
  • hamishmb
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2022
    • 253

    #2
    Good to see this happening, but I feel it's a shame that these things are often in partnership with Canonical, instead of a more community-focused group.

    I don't like where Canonical is going with snap, so I switched from Linux Mint to LMDE recently.

    Comment

    • Jumbotron
      Senior Member
      • Jul 2015
      • 1187

      #3
      Originally posted by hamishmb View Post
      Good to see this happening, but I feel it's a shame that these things are often in partnership with Canonical, instead of a more community-focused group.

      I don't like where Canonical is going with snap, so I switched from Linux Mint to LMDE recently.
      Why is it a shame that it’s Canonical ? Who does a better job of shipping a better Linux experience out of the box for most people amongst the Big Three, Red Hat, Suse and Canonical ? Another question is why didn’t Intel choose to debut this with Red Hat or Suse ? Willingness on their part ? Or Canonical is better able to be a partner ? Intel is a mega-corp with a product to push. They’re not going to go and partner with Arch or Mint or Slackware for the good of the community .

      Comment

      • woddy
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2023
        • 259

        #4
        But they created a ppa with extra support for this hardware just for testing purposes.
        Where is the news ?

        ​This repository is a preview that does not come with the same guarantees as the Ubuntu archives, is intended for testing and validation purposes only, and is not recommended for use in production environments.

        Comment

        • Zorglubis
          Junior Member
          • Dec 2024
          • 1

          #5
          Originally posted by Jumbotron View Post

          Why is it a shame that it’s Canonical ? Who does a better job of shipping a better Linux experience out of the box for most people amongst the Big Three, Red Hat, Suse and Canonical ? Another question is why didn’t Intel choose to debut this with Red Hat or Suse ? Willingness on their part ? Or Canonical is better able to be a partner ? Intel is a mega-corp with a product to push. They’re not going to go and partner with Arch or Mint or Slackware for the good of the community .
          They did not choose Fedora or Suse because those distros already ship an up to date kernel and Mesa stack. They need to work with Canonical because Ubuntu is lagging behind, and as it's very popular, they do not want their card to get a bad reputation when Ubuntu users buy them.

          Comment

          • geerge
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2023
            • 324

            #6
            Originally posted by Jumbotron View Post

            Why is it a shame that it’s Canonical ? Who does a better job of shipping a better Linux experience out of the box for most people amongst the Big Three, Red Hat, Suse and Canonical ? Another question is why didn’t Intel choose to debut this with Red Hat or Suse ? Willingness on their part ? Or Canonical is better able to be a partner ? Intel is a mega-corp with a product to push. They’re not going to go and partner with Arch or Mint or Slackware for the good of the community .
            Red Hat. Ubuntu just has the numbers.

            Comment

            • Espionage724
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2024
              • 319

              #7
              Originally posted by hamishmb View Post
              Good to see this happening, but I feel it's a shame that these things are often in partnership with Canonical, instead of a more community-focused group.

              I don't like where Canonical is going with snap, so I switched from Linux Mint to LMDE recently.
              I prefer Snaps on Ubuntu over Flatpaks anywhere else (including my favorite distro Fedora). I started out on Ubuntu, and feel they still today provide the best desktop experience. Them doing Snaps isn't a light decision, them still doing it implies it's working, and even though I absolutely can't stand most abstraction (Proton, Lutris, Wayland, libinput, Docker/containers, immutable/Atomic, Flatpak), I don't have anything negative with Ubuntu and Snaps.

              I used Snaps with Ubuntu early, experienced the slow Firefox start-up, but either dealt with it or switched to non-Snap (was a brief install before back to Fedora ). I thought the graphics driver switch with Steam Snap was cool! (oibaf/kisak/default, but just with Steam and not system-wide PPA).

              I still can install most of my stuff as non-Snap on Ubuntu, and afaik default Minimal only includes Firefox as a Snap. I last used Ubuntu 24.10 and everything was fine. I still entertain Ubuntu for set-ups I want everything working with little-to-no nonsense, and high-end gaming is Ubuntu + Liquorix or XanMod.

              Overall, I'm cool with the news

              Edit: I'm on 24.10 now and everything looks good! I only notice Firefox as a Snap, and it works snappy no problem.
              Last edited by Espionage724; 24 December 2024, 05:24 AM.

              Comment

              • Britoid
                Senior Member
                • Jul 2013
                • 2146

                #8
                Originally posted by Jumbotron View Post

                Why is it a shame that it’s Canonical ? Who does a better job of shipping a better Linux experience out of the box for most people amongst the Big Three, Red Hat, Suse and Canonical ? Another question is why didn’t Intel choose to debut this with Red Hat or Suse ? Willingness on their part ? Or Canonical is better able to be a partner ? Intel is a mega-corp with a product to push. They’re not going to go and partner with Arch or Mint or Slackware for the good of the community .
                Eh, RHEL is a decade ahead of Ubuntu/Debian when it comes to the server stack.

                If you want to see what open source software will be in Ubuntu/Debian in 10 years time, download Rocky/Alma.

                Comment

                • sarmad
                  Senior Member
                  • Jul 2013
                  • 1222

                  #9
                  Originally posted by geerge View Post

                  Red Hat. Ubuntu just has the numbers.
                  What do you mean by numbers, do you mean install count? I'm not sure if Ubuntu is still as wide spread as it once was, but if it's still the most popular then it makes sense for Intel to collaborate with Canonical.

                  Comment

                  • microcode
                    Senior Member
                    • Mar 2013
                    • 2345

                    #10
                    Really wonder why main Ubuntu still isn't rolling release...

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X