Intel Spots A 3888.9% Performance Improvement In The Linux Kernel From One Line Of Code

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • phoronix
    Administrator
    • Jan 2007
    • 67163

    Intel Spots A 3888.9% Performance Improvement In The Linux Kernel From One Line Of Code

    Phoronix: Intel Spots A 3888.9% Performance Improvement In The Linux Kernel From One Line Of Code

    Intel's Linux kernel test robot has reported a 3888.9% performance improvement in the mainline Linux kernel as of this past week...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
  • fong38
    Senior Member
    • May 2022
    • 146

    #2
    ...wow

    Comment

    • Smurphy
      Phoronix Member
      • Apr 2008
      • 108

      #3
      ... yeah, Wow
      Linuxer since the early beginnings...

      Comment

      • V1tol
        Senior Member
        • May 2016
        • 603

        #4
        ...now we see if that change makes difference in a real-life workloads

        Comment

        • Alexmitter
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2019
          • 1121

          #5
          The issue I see with things like that is that people belive their system will now be 3888.9% times faster. No that is not what that means. It means some specific task inside the kernel will now be 3888.9% times faster and it has to show if that will make the kernel actually messurably faster.

          Comment

          • aerospace
            Phoronix Member
            • Apr 2024
            • 65

            #6
            Does AMD have a kernel robot?

            Comment

            • mush
              Junior Member
              • Feb 2024
              • 3

              #7
              Originally posted by Alexmitter View Post
              The issue I see with things like that is that people belive their system will now be 3888.9% times faster. No that is not what that means. It means some specific task inside the kernel will now be 3888.9% times faster and it has to show if that will make the kernel actually messurably faster.
              Neither the report or the article is for the average pc user, so i don't see what's the problem

              Comment

              • geerge
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2023
                • 335

                #8
                Originally posted by Alexmitter View Post
                The issue I see with things like that is that people belive their system will now be 3888.9% times faster. No that is not what that means. It means some specific task inside the kernel will now be 3888.9% times faster and it has to show if that will make the kernel actually messurably faster.
                The kind of people that think like that also eat paste. If the statistics are being used to intentionally mislead (as all stats can) then there's an issue, is that the case?

                Comment

                • waxhead
                  Premium For Life
                  • Jul 2014
                  • 1143

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Alexmitter View Post
                  The issue I see with things like that is that people belive their system will now be 3888.9% times faster. No that is not what that means. It means some specific task inside the kernel will now be 3888.9% times faster and it has to show if that will make the kernel actually messurably faster.
                  Exactly and very few think "3888.9% of what". If the code previously executed at 0.001ms every 240 seconds on average it would hardly be noticeable at all even with the improvement.

                  That being said it is still a nice improvement.

                  http://www.dirtcellar.net

                  Comment

                  • ddriver
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2014
                    • 711

                    #10
                    Amd is toast then!!!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X