Intel Arc Graphics A580 / A750 / A770 Linux Performance For Early 2024

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • NekoTrix
    replied
    Originally posted by Jarmer View Post

    that was surprising to me as well, to see it listed LOWER than the 6800xt in many cases. What happened? Did they just misbrand the thing, and it's actually a 7700 or 7600 and the 7900 xt is the real 7800 xt?
    Well yes since the 7800 xt only has 60 CUs and the 6800 xt has 72 CUs. It was severely misbranded. It's actually a successor to the 60 CUs 6800 non-xt.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jarmer
    replied
    Originally posted by ResponseWriter View Post
    It's a little disappointing to see the 7800 XT still mostly delivering equal or worse performance compared to the 6800 XT. I hoped it would improve as drivers matured. As I'm restricted by my case to dual-fan cards, RDNA4 will need some big efficiency gains to provide any incentive to upgrade. Intel doesn't appear to have anything in remotely the same class.

    Thanks for the benchmarks, Michael.
    that was surprising to me as well, to see it listed LOWER than the 6800xt in many cases. What happened? Did they just misbrand the thing, and it's actually a 7700 or 7600 and the 7900 xt is the real 7800 xt?

    Leave a comment:


  • schmidtbag
    replied
    Originally posted by stormcrow View Post
    I'm hopeful the next version is an all around improvement on a what's essentially a tech preview version. If it is, and if Intel's driver stack developers can get its act together on the revised Xe drivers, then I'll seriously consider the A770 revision equivalent so long as it has 16GB VRAM+ as a replacement for my current 8 GB card. The RX 7600 XT revision just doesn't benefit me enough right now to spend the $320 just to double my VRAM even though I have a couple of programs that could benefit... it's not an all around improvement. I can't afford the $400+ cards like the 6800 XT.
    I think Battlemage will be good. Not great, not even good enough to cause AMD (let alone Nvidia) to lower their prices, but I could see it being a solid choice for the average person. Celestial is where I think Intel will start being truly competitive, since that'll be Xe3 (Battlemage and Alchemist are both Xe2) and the drivers will be in much better shape by then.

    Intel is making good progress but whenever we see triple-digit performance improvements, the drivers are still too broken to recommend them.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brane215
    replied
    Whatever happens, market prices move accordingly.
    ARC770 hits most of the time somewhere between RX7600 and RX7600XT and that's exactly how it's priced.

    Leave a comment:


  • stormcrow
    replied
    Originally posted by schmidtbag View Post
    Interesting what potential there is. There's a few cases where the A770 punched far above its weight.
    I'm hopeful the next version is an all around improvement on a what's essentially a tech preview version. If it is, and if Intel's driver stack developers can get its act together on the revised Xe drivers, then I'll seriously consider the A770 revision equivalent so long as it has 16GB VRAM+ as a replacement for my current 8 GB card. The RX 7600 XT revision just doesn't benefit me enough right now to spend the $320 just to double my VRAM even though I have a couple of programs that could benefit... it's not an all around improvement. I can't afford the $400+ cards like the 6800 XT.

    Leave a comment:


  • schmidtbag
    replied
    Interesting what potential there is. There's a few cases where the A770 punched far above its weight.

    Leave a comment:


  • Quackdoc
    replied
    I would have liked to see numbers for the a380 to cross reference

    Leave a comment:


  • aufkrawall
    replied
    So disappointing that games like Hitman 3 still don't work. Looks like they are just not serious with offering a viable alternative when it comes to gaming.
    Afaik there even was a collaboration between Intel and Hitman 3 devs for RT...

    Leave a comment:


  • Danny3
    replied
    Originally posted by ResponseWriter View Post
    It's a little disappointing to see the 7800 XT still mostly delivering equal or worse performance compared to the 6800 XT. I hoped it would improve as drivers matured. As I'm restricted by my case to dual-fan cards, RDNA4 will need some big efficiency gains to provide any incentive to upgrade. Intel doesn't appear to have anything in remotely the same class.

    Thanks for the benchmarks, Michael.
    True, well said!

    Leave a comment:


  • ResponseWriter
    replied
    It's a little disappointing to see the 7800 XT still mostly delivering equal or worse performance compared to the 6800 XT. I hoped it would improve as drivers matured. As I'm restricted by my case to dual-fan cards, RDNA4 will need some big efficiency gains to provide any incentive to upgrade. Intel doesn't appear to have anything in remotely the same class.

    Thanks for the benchmarks, Michael.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X