Originally posted by M@GOid
View Post
Linux really should have rejected these patches, this isn't even immoral, it's just downright backwards. It reminds me of the old days when IBM used to sell mainframes and would put usage counters on their tape readers so they could bill the corporations/governments using them like how a power company would check your meter to bill you. Except IBM had a legitimate case there given how prohibitively expensive the hardware was and the fact that it would break down so often that it was honestly beneficial that IBM owned it given how often they'd have to maintenance it. But this, this is just pure greed. Intel doesn't have to own anything, it's a chip the size of a postcard. They have nothing to maintenance, it's all solid-state technology.
It's not immediately a bad deal. Again, this is for datacenters. These bills are for giant corporations to absorb. On the surface, that's not an issue at all. Honestly, they deserve to be taken advantage of. The real issue is the matter of Intel seeing success in this venture and then seeking out civilian markets to employ this tactic with. And thats why Linux should have rejected these patches and told Intel to try shilling their DRM somewhere else.
Comment