Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Canonical To Not Enable UXA, Too Problematic

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • TechMage89
    replied
    No, NVIDIA and ATI drivers don't need to use UXA, they can get all the benefits that UXA offers using only the EXA API, simply by replacing the "dumb" memory allocation system in the backend with GEM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Raine
    replied
    What about Nvidia..

    Hi! About nvidia and ati drivers. Will they be using UXA someday?

    Leave a comment:


  • bulletxt
    replied
    Wise decision.

    Leave a comment:


  • jblackhall
    replied
    I, for one, am glad they're making a quality control decision if the UXA isn't up to snuff.

    Leave a comment:


  • phoronix
    started a topic Canonical To Not Enable UXA, Too Problematic

    Canonical To Not Enable UXA, Too Problematic

    Phoronix: Canonical To Not Enable UXA, Too Problematic

    In August of last year Intel had introduced the UMA Acceleration Architecture (commonly referred to as UXA). UXA is based upon the very common EXA acceleration API but it handles the pixmap management using GEM objects...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
Working...
X