Originally posted by torsionbar28
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Intel Provides Update On 7nm, New US Fabs, "Intel On" Event
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by BlueCrayon View PostThe whole "Intel 7nm is smaller than TSMCs 7nm" is absolutely moot, because TSMCs 7nm is available NOW, and has been since last year, while Intel's 2023 timeline is optimistic looking at their track record. TSMC is actually already serving 5nm to Apple and is into 3nm risk production. AMD will be on 5nm next year, so that's 2022 if you're still counting, a year before Intel will have their magical 7nm.
And for the people that say they don't care about the process - you should, because Intel needs to keep up core-wise with AMD, but if they're not on the same process you get more energy consumption and more heat. Which is why every Intel chip from gen 8 onward runs like a furnace, because 14nm wasn't supposed to have more than 4 cores, but Ryzen forced their hand
Comment
-
Originally posted by ed31337 View Post
Raspberry Pi 4 is built on a 28nm process and it doesn't run like a furnance.Last edited by BlueCrayon; 24 March 2021, 01:43 PM.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by piotrj3 View Post
Turbo on AMD also does cheat TDP values. And intel has public spec towards how turbo is working and allows each laptop manufacture to tweak those values etc.
AMD: 65 watt to 100 watt (+ 53%)
Welp.. I still choose AMD.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by t.s. View Post
Welp.. I still choose AMD.
Comment
-
Originally posted by piotrj3 View Post
Intel 10nm is availiable in some laptops now, and is smaller then TSMC 7nm. I don't think Intel 7nm will be worse then their 10nm so -_-
Intel's 10nm process apparently had terrible defect rates until their most recent fixes. Tigerlake is the first product where it really worked the way they needed it to, and so now they're finally working on expanding it's use into server and desktop products later this year.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by t.s. View Post
Intel: 65 watt to 200+ watt (+200%)
AMD: 65 watt to 100 watt (+ 53%)
Welp.. I still choose AMD.We're walking through the recurring challenge Intel faces regarding motherboard manufacturer freedom and stability, high thermals, and needlessly high power ...
you need to watch video. Thing is in case of Intel, Intel makes a guidance that motherboard manufactures don't have to follow regarding turbo etc.
In nutshell Intel according to guidance for 11700k in blender test does 126W, while some motherboards out of box can go as far as 182W. Thing is that is at best 8% performance gain for such big diffrence in power consumption and this is why Intel so often is rumored to be extremly hot.
Don't get me wrong, AMD is more energy efficient on 7nm with according to guidance vs according to guidance, but diffrence is way smaller then it is rumored to be.
Comment
-
Originally posted by piotrj3 View PostTurbo on AMD also does cheat TDP values. And intel has public spec towards how turbo is working and allows each laptop manufacture to tweak those values etc.
There is a world of difference between a 105w CPU drawing 136w when boosted, and a 65w CPU sucking down triple. Another interesting investigation is this one.
And thanks for the video, but I can read faster than he can talk. Video reviews are torturous.
- Likes 3
Comment
Comment