Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Intel Platform Monitoring Telemetry Appears Destined For Linux 5.10

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Intel Platform Monitoring Telemetry Appears Destined For Linux 5.10

    Phoronix: Intel Platform Monitoring Telemetry Appears Destined For Linux 5.10

    As first outlined earlier this year, Intel has been working on the Linux support for Platform Monitoring Technology as a new hardware telemetry feature first introduced with new Tigerlake hardware. It's looking like the initial Intel PMT support will come with Linux 5.10 while further work is being prepared that builds off its foundation...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Just one question. Can it be fully disabled?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by mppix View Post
      Just one question. Can it be fully disabled?
      Probably not since "modern" platforms are full of unverifiable closed blobs and arcane features (Intel ME/AMT, AMD PSP, x86 SMM and so on)

      Comment


      • #4
        PMT ?

        Does it only collect data on a monthly basis and get stroppy about it ?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by mppix View Post
          Just one question. Can it be fully disabled?
          It's a driver that exposes the information to user-space applications. If you don't want to use it, don't run the user-space apps or blacklist the driver.
          Last edited by GrayShade; 21 September 2020, 02:41 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by skeevy420

            phoronix Found a typo. Should be "consume".
            'process' would be better.
            Hi

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by stiiixy View Post

              'process' would be better.
              Possibly, but Michael uses the word consumed in the next sentence so consume/consumed is what I went with. Whatever the case, a past-tense needs to be changed to a present-tense.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by numacross View Post

                Probably not since "modern" platforms are full of unverifiable closed blobs and arcane features (Intel ME/AMT, AMD PSP, x86 SMM and so on)
                That's why it would be great to finally get POWER architecture support up to scratch so that we switch to Raptor machines without downsides

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by skeevy420 View Post

                  Possibly, but Michael uses the word consumed in the next sentence so consume/consumed is what I went with. Whatever the case, a past-tense needs to be changed to a present-tense.
                  When you consume something, it's a once off affair. And shit comes out the end.

                  Process something and you get a useful product.

                  Not 'possibly', but 'actually'.
                  Hi

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X