Originally posted by tildearrow
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Intel SVT-AV1 0.6 Released With AV1 Decoding, SIMD Optimizations
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by log0 View Post
I don't understand such claims. An encoder has to function according to the specification. The quality should depend on the encoding settings only.
Comment
-
Originally posted by smitty3268 View Post
That's exactly the point, the settings are tuned low in order to speed things up. Lots of things the spec defines as optional are turned off. Etc.
Comment
-
Originally posted by log0 View PostWell, then the complaint should be that the default settings produce poor results, not the encoder.
Comment
-
Originally posted by log0 View Post> poor quality results
I don't understand such claims. An encoder has to function according to the specification. The quality should depend on the encoding settings only.
For a format as complex as AV1, trying to brute-force the problem will give you those reference encoder run times, thousands of times slower than real-time, due to the combinatorial explosion. Remark that for a decoder, the features add up to make it slow, but the combinatorial explosion is uniquely an encoder problem.
In the other end of the spectrum, it is very easy to make a fast encoder by simply doing bad decisions (i.e. dropping features). This is what Rav1e started with. But to be both fast and have decent quality, you have to have good heuristics for everything. This is what separates a good encoder from a bad one.Last edited by andreano; 05 July 2019, 01:35 PM.
Comment
Comment