Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

xf86-video-intel Gets Coffee Lake Support

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • xf86-video-intel Gets Coffee Lake Support

    Phoronix: xf86-video-intel Gets Coffee Lake Support

    The xf86-video-intel DDX driver now has support for the first "Coffee Lake" processors...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Does anyone use xf86-video-intel anymore? There were so many problems with it and default modesetting driver works so well with X.

    Comment


    • #3
      does it also get an new tarball release, ever?

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by rene View Post
        does it also get an new tarball release, ever?
        From the article: "It's now been four years since the last stable release of xf86-video-intel and in that time working on xf86-video-intel 3.0 but even there the last development release was three years ago."
        Michael Larabel
        https://www.michaellarabel.com/

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Aleksei View Post
          Does anyone use xf86-video-intel anymore? There were so many problems with it and default modesetting driver works so well with X.
          ME altough im on broadwell if i was on skylake or newer i would use modesetting as SNA isn't tuned for skylake

          Comment


          • #6
            I am using the modesetting driver on a Core 2 Duo (GMA X3100) notebook and on a Haswell (Iris Pro 5200) system. Don't know why I should use this crap. It has tearing problems all over the place and SNA is full of bugs.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Aleksei View Post
              Does anyone use xf86-video-intel anymore? There were so many problems with it and default modesetting driver works so well with X.
              I do on a HD 630 (Kaby Lake); with GNOME, windows seem to move smoother than with modesetting.

              I've done no real testing, but I feel the Intel DDX driver is more optimal than modesetting; Xorg's log reports 4 threads being used with intel, and SNA sounds better to be using for 2D (a dedicated 2D path vs passing it over 3D). And on a slightly different note, using the blt engine instead of SNA (AccelMethod=blt), seems even smoother.

              With that said though, modesetting does seem to work. But I have no problems with the Intel DDX driver either.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Aleksei View Post
                Does anyone use xf86-video-intel anymore? There were so many problems with it and default modesetting driver works so well with X.
                I used to. Now I use Wayland.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by -MacNuke- View Post
                  Don't know why I should use this crap. It has tearing problems all over the place and SNA is full of bugs.
                  Same for me. Modsetting has terrible diagonal tearing and I failed to find a solution for this. And xf86-intel has some problems with text corruption, especially with tool-tips. I'm using a Pentium G4560 (KabyLake).

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Did Intel actually send out bags of "8th generation" coffee ?
                    Test signature

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X