Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux for ARM Hits General Availability

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux for ARM Hits General Availability

    Phoronix: Red Hat Enterprise Linux for ARM Hits General Availability

    Red Hat now considers their ARM support on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL7) to be supported under general availability "GA" terms...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Sigh, no ARM board with UEFI to run this thing is around.

    Comment


    • #3
      Just in time for Qualcomm Centriq.

      Runs on HPE Apollo blades.

      RHEL also runs on POWER8.

      Hewlett Packard Enterprise Apollo hyperscale servers are high density optimized servers that provide high performance computing with the latest innovations in power savings and cooling.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by starshipeleven View Post
        Sigh, no ARM board with UEFI to run this thing is around.
        No commodity board anyways. Have to buy a complete ARM server from one of the mentioned vendors. It would be really nice if someone like Supermicro stepped up and created a standard form factor server/workstation grade ARM board that could be used in whitebox builds. It would be a killer solution for small NAS, firewall, and other appliance type devices.

        Comment


        • #5
          One would think that manufacturers who intend to promote an all-new server architecture would be interested in making smaller samples of it easily available to prospective customers to test and start to like it. But it seems they've chosen to only target large-scale supercomputer installations. Well, I don't know the exact size of the world-wide supercomputer market, but it's got to be tiny in comparison to the server market as a whole. And they won't conquer the latter without much smaller scale offerings.

          But maybe their proclaimed "better performance per price" ratio is true only when compared to the very expensive end of the range computers are sold for.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by dwagner View Post
            Well, I don't know the exact size of the world-wide supercomputer market, but it's got to be tiny in comparison to the server market as a whole.
            That was true 10 years ago, yes. But these days hadoop and big data has brought supercomputer-like requirements to the standard corporate datacenter. A business may only have one rack full of nodes for their big data needs while a traditional supercomputer (think Los Alamos) is hundreds of racks, but the architecture is very similar - dense commodity nodes with some type of low latency interconnect. Supercomputers are no longer just for science and engineering.
            Last edited by torsionbar28; 13 November 2017, 08:27 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by dwagner View Post
              One would think that manufacturers who intend to promote an all-new server architecture would be interested in making smaller samples of it easily available to prospective customers to test and start to like it. But it seems they've chosen to only target large-scale supercomputer installations. Well, I don't know the exact size of the world-wide supercomputer market, but it's got to be tiny in comparison to the server market as a whole. And they won't conquer the latter without much smaller scale offerings.

              But maybe their proclaimed "better performance per price" ratio is true only when compared to the very expensive end of the range computers are sold for.
              I think the initial main target market is more like "cloud" and appliance stuff (big NAS boxes, network switches etc.) than HPC. There's a couple of aarch64 HPC systems being built, but honestly I think it's more of a kicking the tires, development and evaluation platforms than stuff for "real" work. The real HPC stuff will come later with SVE.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by jabl View Post

                I think the initial main target market is more like "cloud" and appliance stuff (big NAS boxes, network switches etc.) than HPC. There's a couple of aarch64 HPC systems being built, but honestly I think it's more of a kicking the tires, development and evaluation platforms than stuff for "real" work. The real HPC stuff will come later with SVE.
                Some info about ARM & HPC: https://www.nextplatform.com/2017/11...ter-thunderx2/

                Every year at the Supercomputing Conference (SC) an unofficial theme emerges. For the last two years, machine learning and deep learning were focal

                Comment


                • #9
                  Oh, cavium, sounds extremely tasty.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X