Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 & Ryzen 3 1300X Linux Performance
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Shuliande View Postwow! they run great, but what happen with avx? some bug somewhere or just the avx unit in those cpu suck? also i think it will be interesting a comparison bewteen the intel's avx & amd's one with the power consumption of both the platform under load... one little bird had told me the intel one drain a lot...... but maybe is wrong xD
Edit: what VikingGe said
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by VikingGe View PostRyzen has half the FMA throughput per core and clock cycle compared to Intel's current lineup. But that doesn't explain the Himeno results. Even the Pentium G4400, which doesn't have AVX and therefore no FMA, destroys Ryzen in that test. And Ryzen does well in some other FPU-heavy workloads.
Still no word from AMD on the compilation segfaults? Guess I'll keep my Phenom II for another year or two then...
Just how the hell do they plan on selling their Threadripper and Epyc products when they aren't even capable of what is an everyday task for some potential customers?
On the other hand as you said those result are so strange. As long i remember those fp unit are two for each core, right?
Also i remeber wrong or the ryzen fpu do not throttle while the last intel one does? I do not wanna be a flamer o shit like that, i just wanna learn more
I think Threadripper and Epyc are already a must have for some companies even with this problem.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shuliande View PostOn the other hand as you said those result are so strange. As long i remember those fp unit are two for each core, right?
Comment
-
Hm, I'm actually quite surprised how well Ryzen 5 1400 did in comparison, considering that it's basically a 3 1200 with hyperthreading. I didn't expect much of a difference at all, whereas there's a huge improvement in most cases.
So if I was to make a new PC build, looks like a Ryzen 5 would be the sweet spot. But that's not going to happen for at least a few years still.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GreatEmerald View PostHm, I'm actually quite surprised how well Ryzen 5 1400 did in comparison, considering that it's basically a 3 1200 with hyperthreading. I didn't expect much of a difference at all, whereas there's a huge improvement in most cases.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by pjssilva View PostI second that, I also have an 1700x that crashes in heavy compilations. ... It would be interesting to know if you can reproduce the problem.
I too was disappointed to see no compilation benchmarks as I was thinking of getting a cheap ryzen to offload some compilation to via distcc.
And also, why the sudden drop of CPUs in the benchmarks? I think what would be great would be a fixed set of default benchmarks that you run on every single cpu you get your hands on and create a single regularly updated overview/comparison of all those CPUs
Comment
Comment