Originally posted by hugo8621
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AMD Releases Optimizing C/C++ Compiler For Ryzen
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by peppercats View PostRESTRICTIONS. Except for the limited license expressly granted in Section 2 herein, You have no other rights in the Software, whether express, implied, arising by estoppel or otherwise. Further restrictions regarding Your use of the Software are set forth below. You may not:
modify or create derivative works of the Software;
distribute, publish, display, sublicense, assign or otherwise transfer the Software;
decompile, reverse engineer, disassemble or otherwise reduce the Software to a human-perceivable form (except as allowed by applicable law);
d) alter or remove any copyright, trademark or patent notice(s) in the Software; or
e) use the Software to: (i) develop inventions directly derived from Confidential Information to seek patent protection; (ii) assist in the analysis of Your patents and patent applications; or (iii) modify existing patents.
f) use the Software in a way that requires that the Software or any portion thereof be licensed under a Free Software License.
- Likes 5
Comment
-
Judging only by the description given in the article does it sound very much like they couldn't have cared less if they've tried and that this was the last compiler ever to have come from AMD.
I'm curious if the benchmark will reflect this or if it turns out to be some wonder-magic compiler against all expectations.
Comment
-
Seeing AMD going opensource big time, I don't understand this.
Does this also mean that gcc /clang didn't get the full set of Ryzen optimizations yet ?
Might this be a 'temporary' compiler for demonstrating the power of Ryzen 7/Whitehaven/Naples etc ?
@bridgman: any idea ?
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kemosabe View Post
But the application has to be compiled with a specialized architecture flag? Thus, no one will benefit from it?
Or are you assuming that the people who want the extra performance won't recompile from source for some unspecified reason?
Comment
-
Originally posted by peppercats View Postyeahhh I don't think this is gonna be upstreamedOriginally posted by dungeon View PostThat one is pretty interesting, fuck you AMD
This is just a binary release with the standard binary EULA as far as I know.
Why would we try to push a binary upstream ?Test signature
- Likes 6
Comment
-
Originally posted by bridgman View PostWhy would we try to push a binary upstream ?
While technically legal, it's a shitty thing to do. It seems like a very backwards step given all of your recent open-source work.
Comment
Comment