Originally posted by Ericg
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
It's Come Back Up That Intel Is Reportedly Licensing Radeon Graphics IP
Collapse
X
-
-
If there is one thing everyone can agree on is that Intel graphics are horrible. I could see a deal allowing Intel to use Radeon graphics in their chips as long as it specifies that GPU performance cannot exceed a specified % compared to AMD APU's. 60% performance of Raven ridge graphics would be a huge step up from Intel's iGPU performance, and it wouldn't damage Raven Ridge's sales.
AMD gets a bit of $ in return, Intel gets to cut it's iGPU division. It makes sense when you consider the fact that AMD will have an APU with Ryzen/Vega. Intel's APU sales will be pretty much gutted.
That probably isn't what the deal is about, but I wouldn't be shocked if it is. Intel is smart enough to realize what AMD getting the next 2 major consoles as well means. AMD's driver optimizations will be very good in the future, which is another area Intel could cut out. The deal might save Intel $, give AMD $, and result in a better ecosystem all around while not costing AMD anything. In fact it would benefit both AMD and Intel.Last edited by grndzro; 15 May 2017, 11:56 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by microcode View Post
If it's a Macbook Pro these days, it's probably not going to run Linux ever. These things have become increasingly dicey over the years for it, and I had a 2015 MBP for work reasons, the hardware behaved such that it hung at some point right after boot and there was basically no information online except "yeah dude, me too".All opinions are my own not those of my employer if you know who they are.
Comment
-
Originally posted by eigenlambda View Postif that's true, why can't nvidia sue them for previous inspirations from nvidia patents? The fact that it is possible to switch patent protection providers implies that patents don't actually say anything in particular.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Knowing that the main reason to go for AMD's APUs over Intel's CPUs with integrated GPUs has been that the APUs actually have pretty decent GPUs I can't escape the feeling that AMD is shooting themselves in the foot here.
Either that or then the actual purpose of this deal is to function as a shield against patent lawsuits from more established graphics companies AMD and Nvidia. Rather than AMD having tech Intel wants, AMD simply offered protection from companies like itself for a price lower than what Nvidia previously did.
Comment
-
The IP deal can be for patents, like the one between Intel and NVidia. But to my knowledge, Intel already has access to AMD graphics patents due their traditional cross-licensing deal.
More likely IMO, this is for GPU designs, like the deal that Intel has with Mali and PowerVR.
Originally posted by L_A_G View PostI can't escape the feeling that AMD is shooting themselves in the foot here.
Comment
-
Originally posted by grndzro View PostIf there is one thing everyone can agree on is that Intel graphics are horrible.
i7-7700HQ is a 45W laptop CPU. Rumored Kabylake-G with HBM2 and stronger GPU are... 65-100W. If it's actually true those could be APUs between A10 and CPU + dGPU.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chithanh View PostNot necessarily. For example, Intel could use AMD graphics IP exclusively in CPUs with 8 or more cores. AMD reportedly doesn't plan to offer 8-core APUs (except for gaming consoles) so there would be no competition between the two vendors.
Comment
-
Originally posted by cb88 View Post
The Latter almost cetainly, can you imagine... using GPUs in your product manufactured by your competitor...it would be a nightmare. If they do use GPUs of the same design as radeon they will at the very least have in house hardware design teams so they don't have to worry about AMD holding them hostage.
I'm actually wondering if the coming Apple GPU is AMD derived. Maybe we will get some info with the coming WWDC, but going with AMD IP would result in a fast development cycle and some protection from patent lawsuits.
Comment
-
Originally posted by microcode View Post
If it's a Macbook Pro these days, it's probably not going to run Linux ever. These things have become increasingly dicey over the years for it, and I had a 2015 MBP for work reasons, the hardware behaved such that it hung at some point right after boot and there was basically no information online except "yeah dude, me too".
Comment
Comment