phoronix these results look like there is no SIMD (aka Altivec) enabled. Sure, there is no chance that a PPC970 will be faster than a modern Intel, but it's definitely not that slow.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How An Old PowerMac G5 Compares To Modern Intel CPUs
Collapse
X
-
I know some are wanting some comparisons to POWER8 ... search openbenchmarking.org and you'll see some. And while it starts to be competitive on select benchmarks, the cost to own and operate a POWER8 system is huge. Let's just say that it's hard to give it much credit because it might beat one machine in certain cases, but when you can buy 5, 6, 10+ machines for the cost of a POWER8 system (and likely still have better power consumption), it just doesn't seem interesting anymore.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Min1123 View Post
Your (personal) block size is set too low, please re-read original.
I wonder why you need to point that out, though, as it usually is: do not use the X months linux kernel releases after hardware release until all HW features where properly implemented and things settled down, ... same applies to any other silicon as well ;-)
Comment
-
also if they time compiling linux kernel once for x86, and one for ppc code generation. The difference of amount of code, as well as code generation can be huge, ...
Comment
-
Originally posted by mulenmar View Post
The biggest loss with dropping the old PPC Macs will probably be the native big-endian testing environment.
Running up a PPC emulator in QEMU should let me test for code correctness, at least, even if it’s useless for performance testing...
Comment
-
Comparison of PPC970 and POWER7/8 and also ARM may be seen on 7-zip benchmarks here: http://www.7-cpu.com/
Comment
Comment