Originally posted by starshipeleven
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
There's Still No Sign Of AMD's Low-Cost ARM Development Boards
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by duby229 View PostIn the form of Imageon, yes it did.
That said, they sold that stuff to Qualcomm like 6 years ago or something I think, so they cannot revive it or Qualcomm comes bashing them, anything new has to be done from near-scratch.
Not that it is impossible, just noting that it's less straightforward as you may think.
Comment
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostNo, raspi3 is shit because it was designed to be a GPU with a CPU strapped on to do some minor things, and has only a USB port for device connectivity.
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostWithout a nazi leader (Steve Jobs) to whip them into making anything great, they can only come up with the same pathetic custom hardware.
Toned down the need for standardization, as I think the 96boards spec is part of the problem.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chuckula View Postlow-cost Google Chrome notebooks with excellent power efficiency? You want x86.Originally posted by chuckula View PostThat's called "catchup" and we have a graveyard of companiesOriginally posted by chuckula View Post*ARM really isn't that special when a 65 watt Xeon-D with 16 cores is practically unbeatable in a energy efficiency metric at this point.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Duve View PostThat said, with CentOS behind them now, I would not be surprised if the community spends some time on a AArch64 port (which I think the AltArch SIG is doing at this point) that gets Red Hat's notice latter.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by andreano View PostThat's what I'm saying, hw is shit, but the sw crucially isn't (relatively speaking).
Toned down the need for standardization, as I think the 96boards spec is part of the problem.
Your edit makes no fucking sense. Apple is doing masterful artwork tightly embedded hardware that is totally useless beyond their intended scope (single-user, single-disk, not-terribly-powerful dumb-end-user-devices), which is exactly what most manufacturers are doing already (minus the "masterwork artwork" part)
Standardization is the only thing that allows to keep costs down enough for stuff to sell, AND that allows people to make different devices out of the same components. Then sure there are good and bad standards. But standardization should be the goal.
96boards does not have any kind of clout like say Microsoft or Intel back then that bascially DOMINATED (and still do in x86 land), so they cannot really make designs that are too inconvenient for manufacturers or they risk auto-failing as none shows up.
The road to get the manufacturers to reach some kind of standardized non-shit bootloader sequence and firmware like with UEFI is long and perilous.
Comment
-
AMD, appears to have partially suceced in the goal of making the A1100 arm opterons, they scared NVIDIA and Samsung off the server market, made Qualcomm spend more time in designing a decent chip that won't enter the market in the short term, so when Zen based server products enter the market it isen't overflooded with arm server products.
The A1100 doesen't even look like a serius effort from AMD, It only adresses the low power, low end server market for 25-35Watts, and AMD has the expertise to design a custom core if they really wanted to enter the arm server market seriuslly, this really looks like a low cost design just meant to scare and confuse the competition.
But still I must ask, do these cpu's support KVM or just plain Qemu?
Comment
-
This explains why the Linaro Cloud hasn't responded to my request for an AMD A1100 based CentOS host yet.
The 14nm 65W 16C/32T Xeon D-1587 is around, but expect to pay north of $1500 for the SoC and its only in BGA.
While people seem to have access to pre-release fabs, its still not on Intel ARK.
Intel launched their latest 16 core, Broadwell based Xeon D processors which includes the flagship Xeon D-1587 chip.
Comment
Comment