MINIX 3 Successfully Ported To ARM

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • phoronix
    Administrator
    • Jan 2007
    • 67343

    MINIX 3 Successfully Ported To ARM

    Phoronix: MINIX 3 Successfully Ported To ARM

    The MINIX 3 operating system has been successfully ported to ARM and is starting to be supported by some ARM development boards...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
  • schmidtbag
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 6616

    #2
    I'm surprised this wasn't done sooner, and even more surprised that it was ported to beagleboard before Raspberry Pi. Minix is pretty limited and largely used for educational purposes (just like the Pi) so it would make sense.

    Comment

    • 0xBADCODE
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2012
      • 328

      #3
      Originally posted by schmidtbag View Post
      I'm surprised this wasn't done sooner, and even more surprised that it was ported to beagleboard before Raspberry Pi. Minix is pretty limited and largely used for educational purposes (just like the Pi) so it would make sense.
      Dude, they only recently completed virtual memory support and shared libs support. Yes, their development speed is amazing. Linus started writing his OS Minix. And now what? Minix only starts to have only some features we're using daily on other OSes.

      Comment

      • BSDude
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2013
        • 341

        #4
        Originally posted by 0xBADCODE View Post
        Dude, they only recently completed virtual memory support and shared libs support. Yes, their development speed is amazing. Linus started writing his OS Minix. And now what? Minix only starts to have only some features we're using daily on other OSes.
        lol, definitely it's in better shape than GNU/Hurd is.

        Besides MINIX, L5 is the other worked upon microkernel as I understand. I would think that amount of devs working on MINIX is limited. Nonetheless I find it very interesting to have a working proof-of-concept microkernel. I can see it having a nice home on ARM and other embedded platforms for the start.

        Comment

        • liam
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2009
          • 2328

          #5
          Originally posted by BSDude View Post
          lol, definitely it's in better shape than GNU/Hurd is.

          Besides MINIX, L5 is the other worked upon microkernel as I understand. I would think that amount of devs working on MINIX is limited. Nonetheless I find it very interesting to have a working proof-of-concept microkernel. I can see it having a nice home on ARM and other embedded platforms for the start.
          Microkernels have been used for years, especially in embedded areas, so they are well beyond merely proof of concept. QNX is pretty much the standard AIUI.

          Comment

          • Akka
            Senior Member
            • Jul 2011
            • 437

            #6
            Originally posted by liam View Post
            Microkernels have been used for years, especially in embedded areas, so they are well beyond merely proof of concept. QNX is pretty much the standard AIUI.
            Maybe its not same software but the first versions of QNX is almost 10 years older than Linux.

            Comment

            • JX8p
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2013
              • 125

              #7
              Originally posted by schmidtbag View Post
              I'm surprised this wasn't done sooner, and even more surprised that it was ported to beagleboard before Raspberry Pi. Minix is pretty limited and largely used for educational purposes (just like the Pi) so it would make sense.
              MINIX 3 is moving a lot faster now and is even, perhaps, trying to make inroads as a general purpose operating system. They've incorporated a lot of NetBSD's sources, which is logical as NetBSD itself is moving towards a more modular, lighter kernel architecture via RUMP kernels. This surge of interest is what's moving it forward at such a remarkable pace.

              Comment

              • curaga
                Senior Member
                • Feb 2008
                • 5924

                #8
                Originally posted by BSDude View Post
                lol, definitely it's in better shape than GNU/Hurd is.
                Don't be so sure It's quite possible Hurd actually beats Minix.

                Comment

                Working...
                X