Originally posted by guido12
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
DDR3-800MHz To DDR3-2133MHz Memory Testing With AMD's Kaveri
Collapse
X
-
-
I plan on putting together a Core i3 Haswell or an AMD Kaveri APU (65 W or 45 W chip) mini-ITX PC. I don't plan on gaming and it seems people here are saying timing is more important for CPU based tasks. The most resource heavy tasks I plan on doing are multi-threaded LZMA2 compression and decompression using Pixz and video transcoding using HandBrakeCLI. The x264 test shows not as much a benefit with the higher frequencies.
However, people here are wondering if by "timings on the system memory were maintained the same at all frequencies," Michael means the same number of clocks or the same number of seconds. So if Michael does mean the same number of clocks then how much would CPU tasks benefit from using the recommended number of clocks (ie. keep the timing in seconds to be fairly constant)?
Thanks!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TemplarGR View PostLol. Kids that think they know about technology when in fact they know nothing, amuse me...
Ps4 and Xbox1 may have 8 cores, but:
1) 2 are reserved for the OS, so no games can use them
2) of the remaining six, not all can be utilized by most if not all games... More cores will be used for secondary apps running in the background than the games themselves...
3) Jaguar cores are extremely weak compared to Intel Core. They are so weak, that a Core i 5 quad could easily destroy 8 jaguar cores, even if you could actually utilize them all at once... You see. if you have a single core with 3 times the performance of 3 cores, the single core can match their performace for 3 threads, those 3 cores can't match its performance in one single thread...
4) Single core performance is not "fine" in everything. For example for emulation of modern consoles single threaded performance is pretty weak. Especially AMD's processors.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Rexilion View PostI want my new setup to be futureproof, and here are the downside's of the AMD FX 8350:
- No PCIe 3.0 support
- Bad single core performance
You don't actually need a more expensive cpu than Core i5 4670. In fact, even this cpu is more than you need if all you want is gaming.
Depending on your screen and resolution, the gpu you might need varies. But it is actually better if you buy a mainstream gpu and replace it with a better 20nm gpu 2 years from now. This is what i would do if i was still a gamer...
You only need 8 gigs of ram.
You don't need an SSD, contrary to salesmen who tell you otherwise. Just use a fast HDD.
Just build a rig with Core i5 4670, 8 gigs ram 1600mhz, a mainstream gpu like radeon 270(or comparable Nvidia if you like Linux gaming), a fast hdd 2T+ and you are set...
Of course, if you have money to throw away, by all means do. The world economy could use some spending...Last edited by TemplarGR; 21 January 2014, 01:16 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by mmstick View Post1) PCIE 3.0 isn't needed for anything yet, even if you have have multiple high end graphics cards.
2) Single core performance is fine in everything today -- if you want 'futureproof,' well, all future games are threaded for 8+ cores. See how the PS4 and Xbox One both feature 8 core AMD processors.
Ps4 and Xbox1 may have 8 cores, but:
1) 2 are reserved for the OS, so no games can use them
2) of the remaining six, not all can be utilized by most if not all games... More cores will be used for secondary apps running in the background than the games themselves...
3) Jaguar cores are extremely weak compared to Intel Core. They are so weak, that a Core i 5 quad could easily destroy 8 jaguar cores, even if you could actually utilize them all at once... You see. if you have a single core with 3 times the performance of 3 cores, the single core can match their performace for 3 threads, those 3 cores can't match its performance in one single thread...
4) Single core performance is not "fine" in everything. For example for emulation of modern consoles single threaded performance is pretty weak. Especially AMD's processors.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Dukenukemx View PostWhere can I get ram that says AMD Radeon? Looks pretty cool.
Up to 16GB (2x8GB) of 2133Mhz @ 10-11-11-30
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Dukenukemx View PostWhere can I get ram that says AMD Radeon? Looks pretty cool.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: