Degresivity
Who was expected that memory timing in MHz is lineary tight with its speed went wrong way. Temperature risen with higher clocking has leaded to degresive speed. Higher frequency - subproportional excess of speed. Elementary physics...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
DDR3-800MHz To DDR3-2133MHz Memory Testing With AMD's Kaveri
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by curaga View PostNot out? The date was Jan 14th and it's in stock in many shops.
Just now I searched "amd 7850" and got exactly what I wanted, it's listed $200 not on sale at newegg canada. Sorry D:
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by profoundWHALE View PostConsidering the A10-7850 isn't really even officially out yet AND that it is about half the price of the i7 4770k, then yes, I can see how it would perform almost twice as fast.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mmstick View PostYou can disable turbo boost, but there isn't much point in doing so. It's a very useful feature in processors from here on out, and whoever has the best method of turbo will have the best performing multicore processor. Essentially, what it does is dynamically alters frequency based on core usage. How many people do you know run programs that utilize 8 full cores, or even 4? If the user is only using one core, then that one core will get a significant frequency boost to run that single threaded program faster. If they are using two full cores, then two cores get boosted by a smaller frequency gain. If four cores are being used, then four cores get boosted. If all cores are being fully utilized, then all cores run at their stock frequency -- there is no room for a boost.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Rexilion View PostI find it rather disturbing for the fact that the i7 4770k performs almost twice as fast (CPU wise) than the a10-7850. Especially since the i7 runs with 1600mhz memory while the a10-7850 can go much higher.
It's been 7 years since I last build my computer (I was mostly guided in my choice by someone else tbh). I'm considering to buy an i7 3820 (Ivy-Bridge e, no iGPU ... yay!), but according to cpu-world.com this CPU does not even perform as well as i7 4770 which even has an iGPU. Confusing...
But you should consider the market for the A10, it's for people who don't want to have to go out and get a GPU and overall value. The i7 market is for performance.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Rexilion View PostJust when I thought you gave me a good reason to go with fx-8350 (really), I found that AMD has turbo mode :/
Leave a comment:
-
Anyone aware of any single core benchmarks on openbenchmarking.org??
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Krysto View PostYes, Intel does have an advantage, mostly because of the process advantage, but Intel also "cheats" a lot with Turbo-Boost, which you can never use for too long in the real world, but long enough to give spicy benchmark numbers, making it seem much faster than it will really be in the real world.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Rexilion View PostI find it rather disturbing for the fact that the i7 4770k performs almost twice as fast (CPU wise) than the a10-7850. Especially since the i7 runs with 1600mhz memory while the a10-7850 can go much higher.
It's been 7 years since I last build my computer (I was mostly guided in my choice by someone else tbh). I'm considering to buy an i7 3820 (Ivy-Bridge e, no iGPU ... yay!), but according to cpu-world.com this CPU does not even perform as well as i7 4770 which even has an iGPU. Confusing...
Leave a comment:
-
i reboot like once or twice in a month but i still feel that SSD is a must.
before i had SSD i was in same opinion that its useless and expensive.
finally i bought and i never regret it.. now i know what would be without it.
all the stuff you are doing every day thats using somewhat your hard drives is a lot snappier and thats gives much better experience using my desktop
SSD's arent that expensive anyway anymore.. you buy a 120GB ssd and some 2-4TB HD for big files and you are set.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: