CPU Scaling On DragonFlyBSD, Ubuntu, CentOS/RHEL

[Cthulhux]

Your oh-so-portable Linux even drops support for the i386 platform. Boring.
Please note that using large fonts won't make your bullshit smarter though.

[BSD BullShitDistro]

Attention all BSD zealots/users.

Disprise the lies you spread, Linux has won and owned all ur BSDs. Linux has out class the crap out of all of them especially in areas that you claim your crappy little OS is good at. This benchmark shows the failure of your OS to adapt in the 21st century and thus it's long awaited end.

Your proclaimed advantage over linux is nothing but hot air from the ass.

Linux is way faster then FreeBSD (see Phoronix benchmarks)

Linux is way more secure then OpenBSD (http://www.seifried.org/security/os/...bsd-linux.html)

Linux is way more portable then NetBSD (http://lwn.net/Articles/109547/)

Basically Linux is far better at everything then your useless BSDs.

BSD existence as no longer justified.

Goodbye and do Linux a favor by not coming back.

[joe_gunner]

DragonFly BSD didn't won a SINGLE test if you didn't notice.

Winning Phoronix tests isn't important, it's important to be competitive (and it is), even if it doesn't win a single test. But in fact it did win - Timed PHP Compilation at 12 threads.

[gamerk2]

So bsd fanboys can't even read? DragonFly BSD didn't won a SINGLE test if you didn't notice.

OpenMP support should fix that situation right up.

Secondly, scaling /= true performance. So it depends what you are looking for I guess.

[garegin]

While even DF BSD was so much slower than Dumbuntu you can just imagine how such utter crap like your freeBeSoDumb performs. It's so slow it's not even funny. You should tell them to stop compromizing further.

what do you expect. you can't make a good OS in a basement. the best things things projects have done is create tools like openssl and pf.

Depends. If you stick in your shiny little Linux world, it's Dumbuntu.

While even DF BSD was so much slower than Dumbuntu you can just imagine how such utter crap like your freeBeSoDumb performs. It's so slow it's not even funny. You should tell them to stop compromizing further.

DragonFly 3.2.1 actually scales better than Linux in those tests. It's the GraphicsMagick tests where DragonFly doesn't scale, but I tell you why. GraphicsMagick utilizes OpenMP, but the stock compiler in DragonFly didn't have OpenMP untill the current development version, 3.2 being the stable one, doesn't have it and thus the scalability curve is flat.

So bsd fanboys can't even read? DragonFly BSD didn't won a SINGLE test if you didn't notice.

[joe_gunner]

Actually it's DragonflyBSD which seems to "fail" here.

DragonFly 3.2.1 actually scales better than Linux in those tests. It's the GraphicsMagick tests where DragonFly doesn't scale, but I tell you why. GraphicsMagick utilizes OpenMP, but the stock compiler in DragonFly didn't have OpenMP untill the current development version, 3.2 being the stable one, doesn't have it and thus the scalability curve is flat.

[Cthulhux]

Depends. If you stick in your shiny little Linux world, it's Dumbuntu.

[Rigaldo]

Oh look, Dumbuntu fails again.

Actually it's DragonflyBSD which seems to "fail" here.