Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AMD FX-8350 Linux Performance-Per-Watt

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Kano
    replied
    Well it depends how much overvoltage is needed to get 4.6 ghz. If you need less vcore for the older cpu because it oc better then you see this. oc values are never compareable as those are single part specific.

    Leave a comment:


  • devius
    replied
    Originally posted by abacaba View Post
    FX-8350@4.6 compiles Linux kernel in 72.98 seconds, consumes 207 Watts on average.
    FX-8150@4.6 compiles Linux kernel in 79.25 seconds, consumes 235 Watts on average.

    How is it possible for FX-8150@4.6 to have better performance-per-watt? Results in performance-per-watt graph seems to be wrong...
    That also seemed strange to me. I think there's something wrong with the formula used to come up with those numbers. It's actually calculating how many watts are needed for each second, which obviously reverses the results. That formula works when more is better, but not when less is better. That's why all the graphs involving less is better are wrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • abacaba
    replied
    FX-8350@4.6 compiles Linux kernel in 72.98 seconds, consumes 207 Watts on average.
    FX-8150@4.6 compiles Linux kernel in 79.25 seconds, consumes 235 Watts on average.

    How is it possible for FX-8150@4.6 to have better performance-per-watt? Results in performance-per-watt graph seems to be wrong...

    Leave a comment:


  • log0
    replied
    Wow, 8 pages "Vishera" advertisement!

    Leave a comment:


  • olavgg
    replied
    I agree. And performance/watt/price statistics for 5 years would be nice too.

    Leave a comment:


  • bug77
    replied
    Originally posted by Lynxeye View Post
    Ok, it's nice to see that the 8350 is a improvement over the 8150, but can we please get the same Bench in comparison with the Core i7 3770K, please? This would add real value to the article.
    Yup, the onlt thing you can tell from this article is that the new architecture is a slight improvement over the old one. It would've benn rather puzzling if it weren't. But including the competition makes the whole thing pretty useless.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lynxeye
    replied
    Ok, it's nice to see that the 8350 is a improvement over the 8150, but can we please get the same Bench in comparison with the Core i7 3770K, please? This would add real value to the article.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X