Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Virtual CPUFreq Driver Coming With Linux 6.13 For Better Power/Performance Within VMs

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Virtual CPUFreq Driver Coming With Linux 6.13 For Better Power/Performance Within VMs

    Phoronix: Virtual CPUFreq Driver Coming With Linux 6.13 For Better Power/Performance Within VMs

    Earlier this week was the main power management updates for Linux 6.13 that included switching AMD EPYC Turin to using the amd_pstate driver on supported systems. Sent out this weekend was another set of power management updates that also includes a notable addition: the virtual CPUFreq driver...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    So is this an implementation of the aforementioned KVM-CPUFreq Driver or are those different things?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by joaquinvacas View Post
      So is this an implementation of the aforementioned KVM-CPUFreq Driver or are those different things?
      It is the aforementioned KVM-CPUFreq.
      I'm already rebuilding my servers' kernel with the patch applied.
      I'm trying to find what QEMU/KVM might be needed on the host side. I can't wait to try the whole thing.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by aviallon View Post

        It is the aforementioned KVM-CPUFreq.
        I'm already rebuilding my servers' kernel with the patch applied.
        I'm trying to find what QEMU/KVM might be needed on the host side. I can't wait to try the whole thing.
        My next question would be if Windows VMs will be able to use it, would be really cool, those use to be the most inefficient VMs their own.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by joaquinvacas View Post

          My next question would be if Windows VMs will be able to use it, would be really cool, those use to be the most inefficient VMs their own.
          I don't think so at the moment unfortunately.
          ## VGA ##
          AMD: X1950XTX, HD3870, HD5870
          Intel: GMA45, HD3000 (Core i5 2500K)

          Comment

          Working...
          X