Originally posted by coder
View Post
Apple M4 Mac Mini With macOS vs. Intel / AMD With Ubuntu Linux Performance
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by unwind-protect View PostDoes anybody know for sure whether Apple Silicon chips have a L3 cache?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Forge View PostYeah, that's nuts. I'd seen as high as about 100W at max loaded peak draws, and the "Ultra" is basically two full SOCs, but that's more than I expected. For a total of 24 CPU cores, plus all the other doubled functions, it doesn't seem unreasonable, especially next to the latest Intel/AMD stuff that can dissipate 300W+ from a much smaller number of cores/EUs.
By comparison, the M2 Max version of the Studio is rated at 145 W. At a hair less than half, that's almost linear scaling, although I wonder if the GPU frequency of the Ultra is a little reduced, in order to leave more power budget for the die-to-die interconnect.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by gnattu View PostThey don't have a strict speaking L3 only for CPU clusters like the x86 CPUs produced by Intel and AMD, instead they have an SLC, the SoC Level Cache which is the last level cache before memory shared by all components (CPU, GPU, NPU, etc) on the SoC.
Some people claim Apple's M-series SoCs are only fast because they use a new node and lots of cache, but the M3 and Lunar Lake are both made on the same node and Lunar Lake actually has more overall cache!
Note that Michael didn't include Lunar Lake in these benchmarks, but that's okay because the M4 is on a yet newer node and has two more E-cores. The base M3 is what you really want to compare with Lunar Lake. Same node, same core count, both use on-package memory... Intel really has no excuse, in that matchup.Last edited by coder; 13 November 2024, 05:02 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by coder View PostYes and also both their P-core and E-core clusters use shared L2. In Intel's case, only the E-core clusters share L2.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by sophisticles View PostThis is why I can't see anyone buying one of these to install Linux, or any other OS for that matter, on these.
You lose way to much for what you gain.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Volta View Post
What a clown. By installing Linux you'll get probably three times more CPU performance. Not to mention wonderful Linux features.
As for 3 times the performance, clearly you are wrong, because the AMD and Intel systems are running Linux and they are not 3 times faster.
So yes, you are a clown, and not a funny one at that.
Comment
-
Comment