Apple M4 Mac Mini With macOS vs. Intel / AMD With Ubuntu Linux Performance

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mdedetrich
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2019
    • 2509

    #91
    Originally posted by coder View Post
    Do you realize what a shit solution that is? First, it requires the user to know which packages use a vulnerable library. Then, it requires them to know the compatibility matrix. Finally, it requires them to specifically "upgrade" each package that uses each vulnerable library.

    It's a hack, at best. Not a real solution, at all.
    I am not saying that its ideal, but I am saying that it is possible to do this. And at least for the usecase I described it is eloquent in how stupidly simple it is, you literally place a dll in the same folder as the executable.

    Of course for proper "I want to upgrade the ssl library because there is some security vulnerability globally in the system" its definitely not ideal but for other cases it works quite well.

    Also its not a hack, its a well documented feature in Windows and its entirely intended to be used that way.

    Comment

    • mos87
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2016
      • 398

      #92
      Originally posted by coder View Post
      A lot of people are, myself included.
      How exactly and how many is a lot?

      Comment

      • 0xff
        Junior Member
        • Jun 2021
        • 3

        #93
        Originally posted by phoronix View Post
        Phoronix: Apple M4 Mac Mini With macOS vs. Intel / AMD With Ubuntu Linux Performance...
        Why 7zip compiled without SIMD (SSE2) for test?


        Comment

        • Craggles086
          Junior Member
          • Jun 2020
          • 5

          #94
          Does the Apple M series answer the whole Risc vs Cisc debate that was the rage roughly 15 to 20 years ago?

          Comment

          Working...
          X