Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Intel Xeon 6980P 1S Performance With DDR5-6400/MRDIMM-8800

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Radtraveller
    replied
    ~$37000 for 2P xeon ($17,600-$20,000 each)
    ~$11000 for 2p 9654 ($5500 each on Amazon)

    get 2 AMD servers for the price of one xeon2p server. Maybe even 2 96542p servers and a Workstation ...

    Leave a comment:


  • varikonniemi
    replied
    Originally posted by sophisticles View Post
    I don't think there's any question that Intel has the superior technology overall.

    But a 17+ thousand dollar price tag for a CPU is eye watering.

    This is the reason AMD has been able to claw market share away from Intel, and one of the main reasons why Intel has taken such a huge hit to it's share price.

    AMD has been competing for years on what I refer to as the American muscle car approach to performance, big engines, relatively little sophistication, just a big set of stones.

    Or if you prefer, the all you can eat approach to dining, let people stuff their faces at a reasonable price.

    Intel meanwhile has been trying to cater to a more upscale, more sophisticated crowd, at premium prices.

    We can see which approach the market seems to embrace more.

    What I would like to see if Intel fuse both approaches and start offering processors at lower price points that feature E-cores only, and lots of them, onboard ram and dedicated accelerators, on all it's processors, from the lowly entry level offerings to the big guns.

    if AMD offers an 12C/24T Zen 6 for $500 then Intel should offer a 40 E-Core processor and 20 gb of on die ram.

    Basically offer such a compelling alternative that even if the consumer can't use it they want it.
    AMD has been wiping the floor with intel for a long time, and intel has superior tehnology just because they manage to beat the outgoing generation of hardware? Keep in mind intel is competing against a processor here that was released 15 months ago.

    Leave a comment:


  • uxmkt
    replied
    Originally posted by Phoronos View Post
    So many processors which are not very different ...
    Why so many ?
    Maximum salvaging of partially-defect manufacturing output.

    Leave a comment:


  • sophisticles
    replied
    I don't think there's any question that Intel has the superior technology overall.

    But a 17+ thousand dollar price tag for a CPU is eye watering.

    This is the reason AMD has been able to claw market share away from Intel, and one of the main reasons why Intel has taken such a huge hit to it's share price.

    AMD has been competing for years on what I refer to as the American muscle car approach to performance, big engines, relatively little sophistication, just a big set of stones.

    Or if you prefer, the all you can eat approach to dining, let people stuff their faces at a reasonable price.

    Intel meanwhile has been trying to cater to a more upscale, more sophisticated crowd, at premium prices.

    We can see which approach the market seems to embrace more.

    What I would like to see if Intel fuse both approaches and start offering processors at lower price points that feature E-cores only, and lots of them, onboard ram and dedicated accelerators, on all it's processors, from the lowly entry level offerings to the big guns.

    if AMD offers an 12C/24T Zen 6 for $500 then Intel should offer a 40 E-Core processor and 20 gb of on die ram.

    Basically offer such a compelling alternative that even if the consumer can't use it they want it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eric a un avis
    replied
    Do not confuse with Motorola 6809P. Not exactly the same!

    Leave a comment:


  • Phoronos
    replied
    So many processors which are not very different ...
    Why so many ?

    Leave a comment:


  • chuckula
    replied
    Thanks for the review and it's interesting to see that even your server-centric workloads still have plenty of cases where scaling to two sockets isn't buying you a whole lot of extra performance.

    Of course, many real servers are running multiple workloads simultaneously so it evens out, but I'd be interested in the benefits & drawbacks of single socket vs multi socket servers for different use cases.

    Leave a comment:


  • Intel Xeon 6980P 1S Performance With DDR5-6400/MRDIMM-8800

    Phoronix: Intel Xeon 6980P 1S Performance With DDR5-6400/MRDIMM-8800

    With the Xeon 6980P Granite Rapids benchmarking at Phoronix the past few weeks it's been in a dual socket (2S / 2P) configuration. For those curious about the Intel Xeon 6980P 128-core server performance for a single socket (1S) configuration, here are those complementary results out today and for both DDR5-6400 and MRDIMM-8800 memory configurations. Thus a well-rounded look at the single Xeon 6980P performance compared to other single and dual socket Intel Xeon and AMD EPYC server processors.

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
Working...
X