AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: 100+ Benchmarks Validate Zen 5's Captivating Power Efficiency & Performance

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • robclark
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2011
    • 565

    #91
    Originally posted by smitty3268 View Post

    To save people having to manually look up the scores to compare:

    7zip compression:
    qualcomm x1e-78: 86,318
    amd 365: 86,059
    amd 370: 90,275
    amd 7840HS: 81,522

    quantlib size xxs:
    qualcomm x1e-78: 6.28025
    amd 365: 5.38639
    amd 370: 6.01127
    amd 7840HS: 6.25762​
    I suspect this result might be power limited on the new chips, given the higher zen 4 score. I believe Qualcomm allows their chips to use quite a bit of power on multi-threaded code.
    so I fumbled my way around building up a test suite, but several didn't have aarch64 (looks like PTS is trying to download an x86 binary?), and TesorFlow installed but failed to run (looks like I'm missing some py module, I'll have to try again tonight). PTS bailed out without uploading results when TensorFlow failed to run, or maybe I did something wrong. But here are the results of what did run:
    Code:
    GraphicsMagick 1.3.43:
        pts/graphics-magick-2.2.0 [Operation: HWB Color Space]
        Test 2 of 4
        Estimated Trial Run Count:    3                              
        Estimated Test Run-Time:      4 Minutes                      
        Estimated Time To Completion: 1 Hour, 14 Minutes [04:00 UTC]
            Started Run 1 @ 02:47:26
            Started Run 2 @ 02:48:30
            Started Run 3 @ 02:49:35
    
        Operation: HWB Color Space:
            196
            202
            200
    
        Average: 199 Iterations Per Minute
        Deviation: 1.53%
    
        Comparison of 524 OpenBenchmarking.org samples since 27 March; median result: 245 Iterations Per Minute. Box plot of samples:
        [    |-------------------------------------*########*!##*#*#---*-------------------------------------------------------------------*-----|    ]
                                                   ^ This Result (22nd Percentile): 199
                                         INTEL XEON PLATINUM 8592: 294 ^                                            AMD Ryzen 9 5950X: 609 ^
                                   Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H: 269 ^
                              2 x INTEL XEON PLATINUM 8592: 262 ^
                          2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8468: 244 ^
    
    Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0:
        pts/build-llvm-1.5.0 [Build System: Ninja]
        Test 3 of 4
        Estimated Trial Run Count:    3                              
        Estimated Test Run-Time:      58 Minutes                    
        Estimated Time To Completion: 1 Hour, 11 Minutes [04:01 UTC]
            Running Pre-Test Script @ 02:50:45
            Started Run 1 @ 02:51:02
            Running Interim Test Script @ 03:02:06
            Started Run 2 @ 03:02:28
            Running Interim Test Script @ 03:13:50
            Started Run 3 @ 03:14:11
            Running Post-Test Script @ 03:25:29
    
        Build System: Ninja:
            661.87
            680.207
            675.523
    
        Average: 672.533 Seconds
        Deviation: 1.42%
    
        Comparison of 1,518 OpenBenchmarking.org samples since 22 March 2023; median result: 326 Seconds. Box plot of samples:
        [                                          *            |----------------------------*--*---------------*-----------------*--*-###*#####!##*|*]
                                                                                                       This Result (27th Percentile): 673 ^
                         Intel Core i5-6260U: 5340 ^                  Intel Core i7-8565U: 2966 ^                  2 x INTEL XEON PLATINUM 8592: 101 ^
                                                                                     Intel Core i7-1185G7: 2093 ^   Intel Xeon Platinum 8471N: 209 ^
                                                                  Intel Core i7-1065G7: 3077 ^            AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U: 940 ^
                                                                                                          AMD Ryzen 7 6800U: 1098 ^
    
    ​
    idk what the state of GraphicsMagick is as far as neon support, it looks like it could use some optimization.

    Comment

    • KDE_FOREVER
      Banned
      • Jul 2024
      • 158

      #92
      Originally posted by sophisticles View Post
      Yawn!

      As already pointed out, the performance is not that great when you consider 12C/24T for the new chips vs 8C/16T for the older chips, gee, I wonder which one is going to be faster?

      The power consumption is a nice improvement, very impressive, though I expect Lunar Lake to take these chips to school in that department.

      Overall, it looks like a hard pass is in order for these chips from Linux users perspective, at least until Linux support is up to snuff.


      squeal more maggot.

      Amd wipes the floor with intel

      Intel announced firing of almost 18000 people​

      Comment

      • KDE_FOREVER
        Banned
        • Jul 2024
        • 158

        #93
        Originally posted by sophisticles View Post

        I think Intel removed HT on these chips so that they could have an easy way to increase performance with the chips that replace LL.

        Thanks to architectural improvements they have produced increased efficiency and performance that will be appealing without the need for HT.

        With future versions where they need to add performance relatively easily, they can just add HT back and instant performance improvement.
        you started with "I think" and that is a lie right there

        Comment

        Working...
        X