Originally posted by yump
View Post
image.png
The loser on min of 0.2 and max greater than the "winner", looks like its perf outcome is heavily dependant on some random seed, so all it tells you is "it did some calcs in some time".
It would be great if the benchmarkers generally started doing some proper statistical analysis on the results (ffs, R is cross platform and free/open source, there is no excuse not to) I seriously doubt if there is any statistically significant difference in any of those Luxcore benchmarks.
Leave a comment: