AMD P-State Preferred Core Patches For Linux Updated, Will Be Enabled By Default

[citral]

I just recently read somewhere that you can load your own UEFI and activate it. Can't find it now but I leave the searching to you.

Nah, when I fire smokeless UAF on the laptop it says CPPC is _already_ enabled in bios.
The real problem is that it's not baked in ACPI Tables, and that's the same issue with more modern laptops and S3 suspend, enabled in bios, disabled in ACPI because of Microsoft pushing for modern standby or whatever bullshit (no I don't need to receive emails on standby, go f urself)

And the other problem is that those acpi tables are such a buggy mess that you can decompile them, but can't even recompile them ever, let alone after editing them.

[nranger]

AMD "C" cores are not like Intel "E" cores. They have the same hardware features as the normal Zen cores, but are rearranged in a way that reduces spaces. This has the problem of also limiting frequencies because of thermals, but for an efficient core that is a feature .

As others has pointed out, AMD also puts less cache on this as another space saving measure.

All of that is correct. Also part of shrinking the cache in the Zen4c core design is elimintation of through-silicon-vias (TSVs) for attaching 3D vcache. They are basically pillars of copper dotted throughout the cache to connect the SRAM fabrics of the stacked die. They are relatively massive compared to the nanometer scale structures on the rest of the chip.

[Anux]

From my benchmarking core 0 is my best core when it is isolated

Yes that's what the article refers to with
"static core ranking".

The other quirk is that there is no way to turn it off once booted, that would've been nice to make testing a bit easier.

Are you able to influence it's behavior with

powerprofilesctl set power-saver

(and the other profiles)

[Namelesswonder]

I am running the patch right now, and it seems to be working although does have a couple quirks. I do think this feature will be very useful for those that have CPUs with widely ranging frequencies, where it is a difference of 300MHz+ from best to the median. For others with more balanced CPUs the benefit will be less.

From my benchmarking core 0 is my best core when it is isolated, however when it isn't it gets saddled with kernel threads and is no longer the most performant core. If I remember correctly when I was benchmarking to test the amd-pstate modes my top 6 cores were 4,6,0 (not isolated),3,2,8. Preferred core does seem to schedule tasks of increasing thread count in roughly that order, although it does seem to like core 8 more than 2 and 3.

One quirk is that while I was doing a single thread zstd benchmark it was getting moved around between core 4 and 6 rapidly, to the point that tracking core utilization showed a fluctuating 40-60% on either of the cores. This persisted for only one more run, and I haven't been able to get it to repeat.

The other quirk is that there is no way to turn it off once booted, that would've been nice to make testing a bit easier.

[jonix]

Wouldn't this kill x86-64-v4/AVX512 microarchitecture support?

AMD "C" cores are not like Intel "E" cores. They have the same hardware features as the normal Zen cores, but are rearranged in a way that reduces spaces. This has the problem of also limiting frequencies because of thermals, but for an efficient core that is a feature .

As others has pointed out, AMD also puts less cache on this as another space saving measure.

[Kjell]

Absolutely hate the concept of P-cores and E-cores which is why I went with AMD in the first place. Hope this doesn't change in the future..

[vextium]

"...if AMD Ryzen processors go in a hybrid design with a mix of normal and "C" energy-efficient cores,..."

E- and P-cores after Zen 5.

BTW Back from vacation.

Wouldn't this kill x86-64-v4/AVX512 microarchitecture support?

[Anux]

"...if AMD Ryzen processors go in a hybrid design with a mix of normal and "C" energy-efficient cores,..."

E- and P-cores after Zen 5.

That's wrong by phoronix, C-Cores are not more energy efficient, they are more space efficient. You could probably get the same efficency by disabling parts of the L2 cache and restrict the max clock of a normal core.

Too bad that some laptop manufacturers like Lenovo or Asus never enabled ACPI_CPPC on most of their Zen2 laptops, and now refuse to enable it under fallacious arguments like "AMD told us it's better no to" because they obviously don't want to allocate any resource to older devices.

I just recently read somewhere that you can load your own UEFI and activate it. Can't find it now but I leave the searching to you.

[citral]

Too bad that some laptop manufacturers like Lenovo or Asus never enabled ACPI_CPPC on most of their Zen2 laptops, and now refuse to enable it under fallacious arguments like "AMD told us it's better no to" because they obviously don't want to allocate any resource to older devices. Tells us everything we need to know about the future of the RoG AlLy.

A 4800U is still a fantastic cpu by today standards, but profits matter much more than this world's e-waste problem for this companies.

[nuetzel]

"...if AMD Ryzen processors go in a hybrid design with a mix of normal and "C" energy-efficient cores,..."

E- and P-cores after Zen 5.

BTW Back from vacation.