Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Intel LAM Will Try Again For Linux 6.4

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • tildearrow
    replied
    Typo:

    Originally posted by phoronix View Post
    more efficient address santizer (ASAN)
    Originally posted by phoronix View Post
    Torvalds also isn't fond of the "LAM" acroynmn

    Leave a comment:


  • tildearrow
    replied
    Innovative? Developers used this technique during the 68000 days, back when it only had 24-bit physical addressing. This led to many problems when the 68020 came out with 32-bit addressing (the processor lacked address masking though).

    Of course this won't be too much of a problem nowadays unless we start requiring 64-bit addressing (and processors with the capability arrive)...

    Leave a comment:


  • phoronix
    started a topic Intel LAM Will Try Again For Linux 6.4

    Intel LAM Will Try Again For Linux 6.4

    Phoronix: Intel LAM Will Try Again For Linux 6.4

    Intel's Linear Address Masking (LAM) functionality to make use of untranslated address bits of 64-bit linear addresses for arbitrary metadata is aiming to be mainlined with the upcoming Linux 6.4 cycle...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
Working...
X