Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AMD P-State EPP Won't Be Ready Until Linux 6.3

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AMD P-State EPP Won't Be Ready Until Linux 6.3

    Phoronix: AMD P-State EPP Won't Be Ready Until Linux 6.3

    For those that were holding out hope that the AMD P-State Linux driver's EPP functionality for more power/performance control under Linux would be ready for the Linux 6.2 kernel merge window, it's been rejected for the cycle and will be held off until at least the Linux 6.3 cycle begins in February...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    a bit problematic that Intel continues to vetoe AMD patches, ... not?

    Comment


    • #3
      Michael


      2nd Paragraph: AMD P-Stat EPP

      Burn after reading

      Comment


      • #4
        when was p-state introduced?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by rene View Post
          a bit problematic that Intel continues to vetoe AMD patches, ... not?
          Indeed. He's definitely not biased and wishes AMD all the best. /s

          Comment


          • #6
            AMD P-State doesn't work for my 3900x to this day (gigabyte x570 pro, cppc enabled in bios).

            Comment


            • #7
              Another massive disappointment.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by rene View Post
                a bit problematic that Intel continues to vetoe AMD patches, ... not?
                As someone who used AMD p-state on release I can see why the new EPP stuff was rejected, the whole AMD p-state is a bit dodgy and half assed. It does seem a bit unfair that someone affiliated with Intel ultimately approves the changes though.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by rene View Post
                  a bit problematic that Intel continues to vetoe AMD patches, ... not?
                  Yeah it'd feel nicer if the maintainer was from a neutral 3rd party.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X