Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Intel Core i9 12900K vs. AMD Ryzen 9 5950X On Linux 6.0

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Well, the explicit purpose of the 12900K was to "one-up" AMD at the cost of horrible inefficiency, so I think Intel has succeeded there.

    Comment


    • #12
      Have they? According to the benchmark data here, the efficiency is only marginally worse. Do you have a source that paints a worse picture?

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by hamishmb View Post
        So performance per watt is now very similar across both CPUs on the average, which is interesting. Still a bit worse on the Intel chip, but not by a huge amount.
        yes thats very interesting i always thought intels 10nm node is much worst but it looks like the different is small but amd still has a small advantage.

        but what we do not know is what is because of intel ISA war and what is because of the 10nm node.

        Phantom circuit Sequence Reducer Dyslexia

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by hamishmb View Post

          Fair point. Do we know if Intel's idle or near-idle power usage is better though? It aught to be due to the E-cores, but would still be good to know.
          Almost certainly, but not because of the E-cores. AMD's problems are the I/O die and the mandatory discrete graphics.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by r1348 View Post
            Well, the explicit purpose of the 12900K was to "one-up" AMD at the cost of horrible inefficiency
            Echoes of the P4 Prescott era. What's old is new again!

            Comment

            Working...
            X