AMD "EFC" Support Added To Mesa 22.1 For Radeon GPUs With VCN 2.0

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • phoronix
    Administrator
    • Jan 2007
    • 67385

    AMD "EFC" Support Added To Mesa 22.1 For Radeon GPUs With VCN 2.0

    Phoronix: AMD "EFC" Support Added To Mesa 22.1 For Radeon GPUs With VCN 2.0

    For AMD Navi "RDNA1" GPUs and newer having at least Video Core Next 2.0 (VCN2) for the video coding block, a new feature was merged today into Mesa 22.1-devel for the open-source AMD video acceleration stack...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
  • tildearrow
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2016
    • 7099

    #2
    Amazing!

    But come on, you better put 4:4:4 and improve the encoding quality on future encoding blocks or else...

    Comment

    • M@GOid
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2014
      • 2083

      #3
      Speaking of hardware video acceleration on Radeon, can AMD devs take a look at Firefox, because version 98 just broke video acceleration just for AMD hardware, and it doesn't looks like it will come back anytime soon.

      Comment

      • brucethemoose
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2021
        • 548

        #4
        Originally posted by tildearrow View Post
        Amazing!

        But come on, you better put 4:4:4 and improve the encoding quality on future encoding blocks or else...
        Hardware-encoded 4:4:4 is pretty niche TBH.

        In fact, what is the use case?

        Comment

        • ernstp
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2007
          • 544

          #5
          Originally posted by M@GOid View Post
          Speaking of hardware video acceleration on Radeon, can AMD devs take a look at Firefox, because version 98 just broke video acceleration just for AMD hardware, and it doesn't looks like it will come back anytime soon.

          https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1758613
          That has nothing to do with AMD, it's just Mozilla that needs to tweak their sandbox setup. (It's also broken on Intel)

          Comment

          • Azpegath
            Senior Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 1093

            #6
            What about RDNA2?

            Comment

            • Quackdoc
              Senior Member
              • Oct 2020
              • 5095

              #7
              Originally posted by brucethemoose View Post

              Hardware-encoded 4:4:4 is pretty niche TBH.

              In fact, what is the use case?
              for one I would consider it necessary for VDI/remote desktop application. and as for game stresming many MMOs benefit from 4:4:4 too.

              Comment

              • tildearrow
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2016
                • 7099

                #8
                Originally posted by brucethemoose View Post

                Hardware-encoded 4:4:4 is pretty niche TBH.

                In fact, what is the use case?
                Even if niche, NVIDIA and Intel already support that.

                Comment

                • M@GOid
                  Senior Member
                  • Oct 2014
                  • 2083

                  #9
                  Originally posted by ernstp View Post

                  That has nothing to do with AMD, it's just Mozilla that needs to tweak their sandbox setup. (It's also broken on Intel)
                  In FF98, video hardware acceleration is working on my Intel iGPU, but not on AMD.

                  Comment

                  • brad0
                    Senior Member
                    • May 2012
                    • 1014

                    #10
                    Originally posted by M@GOid View Post
                    In FF98, video hardware acceleration is working on my Intel iGPU, but not on AMD.
                    You're lucky. It doesn't change what he said though.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X