I really like the format/layout of the article and the focus on geomean of sub-suites vs individual tests. Past articles sometime felt excessively editorialized because you can’t possibly put all 100+ tests and so which ones where shown exposed the article to accusations of bias.
the only question I have is how the final geomean is computed. Does it weigh each test equally or is it a geomean of geomeans? I can see arguments both ways, but I do not that if you have more individual tests for web benchmarks then those could be over represented in the final geomean vs a geomean of geomeans.
Jesus, too many means. You knowhwatimean?
the only question I have is how the final geomean is computed. Does it weigh each test equally or is it a geomean of geomeans? I can see arguments both ways, but I do not that if you have more individual tests for web benchmarks then those could be over represented in the final geomean vs a geomean of geomeans.
Jesus, too many means. You knowhwatimean?
Comment