Intel Core i5 12600K / Core i9 12900K "Alder Lake" Linux Performance

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • drakonas777
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2020
    • 532

    #21
    So efficiency is about the same to ZEN3. It's nice to see that Intel is competitive again.

    Comment

    • uxmkt
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2018
      • 319

      #22
      Originally posted by blacknova View Post
      Performance is good, but power consumptions is quite high.
      In fact, if you watched GamersNexus's take on it, the 12900K is performing like almost two 5900X (1.82). That's a rather terrible efficiency.

      Comment

      • poorguy
        Junior Member
        • Aug 2016
        • 9

        #23
        Where are the usual data compression benchmarks ?

        Comment

        • birdie
          Banned
          • Jul 2008
          • 3368

          #24
          Originally posted by flashmozzg View Post

          It's still broken unless the reviewer did a clean reinstall of WIn 11 on each CPU change.

          https://twitter.com/HardwareUnboxed/...78534929461249
          In later tweets they admitted they'd tested all the Ryzen 5000 CPUs so that they were not affected by the issue and they talked to other reviewers and shared the details.

          Comment

          • mlau
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2006
            • 778

            #25
            Originally posted by MadCatX View Post
            Cool! This is honestly a lot better than I expected. It will be interesting to see how much performance is left on the table once Intel lands some hybrid core handling logic. Zen 4 with DDR5 shall make things pretty interesting.

            Also, thanks a lot for the excellent review Michael!
            Hm, the 12900K is quite underwhelming, especially 1 year after Zen3. It looks like a product intended solely to make ADL look good in benchmarks scores if you ignore the high power draw. Imagine a 5950X-like hypothetical 12990K with 16 real big cores: the thing would consume 400W at full load, and probably be only 1,5x faster than a 5950x on average.
            The 12600K is the real star here.

            Comment

            • Vlad42
              Junior Member
              • Dec 2017
              • 42

              #26
              Originally posted by birdie View Post

              All the reviewers had Windows 11 fully patched which includes a Ryzen 5000 L3 cache fix.

              https://www.techpowerup.com/review/i...2th-gen/4.html
              Windows 11 Professional 64-bit
              Build 10.0.22000.282
              Includes AMD L3 latency fix
              The Win 11 fix appears to be incomplete as there still appear to be problems for Zen 3 CPUs, especially those with multiple CCXs such as the 5900X and 5950X. Note how after the first 10MB, the latency starts to climb on the patched Win 11 (red) vs Win 10 (blue).

              oS2T7wrxSPMKRgXNY3F5EU-970-80.jpg
              Attached Files
              Last edited by Vlad42; 04 November 2021, 11:35 AM. Reason: Edited for clarity

              Comment

              • birdie
                Banned
                • Jul 2008
                • 3368

                #27
                Originally posted by Vlad42 View Post

                The Win 11 fix appears to be incomplete as there still appear to be problems for Zen 3 CPUs, especially those with multiple CCXs such as the 5900X and 5950X. Note how after the first 10MB, the latency starts to climb on the patched Win 11 (red) vs Win 10 (blue).

                Windows 10 (ten) results:



                Comment

                • birdie
                  Banned
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 3368

                  #28
                  And here's Linux, sorry Windows 10 without Intel Thread Director support:



                  I've no idea what Michael has actually measured.

                  Comment

                  • Hans Bull
                    Phoronix Member
                    • Mar 2019
                    • 97

                    #29
                    darktable benchmarks are not on the page they are supposed to be on.

                    Comment

                    • birdie
                      Banned
                      • Jul 2008
                      • 3368

                      #30
                      Originally posted by atomsymbol
                      It turns out AVX-512 can be enabled in BIOS on Alder Lake P-cores, which disables E-cores.
                      Wow, that's freaking amazing. Any benchmarks for AVX-512? What's the source?

                      Anandtech claimed AVX-512 cannot be enabled.

                      Edit: Anandtech has all the data: https://www.anandtech.com/show/17047...d-complexity/2

                      OMG, that performance.



                      8 cores vs 16 cores and 3 times faster.
                      Last edited by birdie; 04 November 2021, 12:38 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X