Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G / Ryzen 7 5700G Linux Gaming Benchmarks

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • kneekoo
    replied
    Originally posted by phoronix View Post
    Phoronix: AMD Ryzen 5 5600G / Ryzen 7 5700G Linux Gaming Benchmarks

    Recently with my Linux benchmarks of the Ryzen 5 5600G and Ryzen 7 5700G Zen 3 APUs with Radeon Vega graphics I touched on the GPU graphics/compute performance in some of the basic benchmarks while in this article are a number of Steam Play and native Linux gaming benchmarks for looking at the potential for these latest-generation desktop APUs for Linux gaming.

    https://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=30505
    Michael, will you please take a look at file system performance with the Samsung 980 Pro (PCIe 4.0) vs 970 Pro (PCIe 3.0)? The 5000G CPUs come with PCIe 3.0, so it would be interesting to see if 980 Pro is significantly better or not.

    Leave a comment:


  • victhor
    replied
    It would be nice installing Windows on that same machine and comparing the results.

    Leave a comment:


  • theriddick
    replied
    "Ryzen 7 5700G for around $359"

    Chuckled when I read that, these things did cost double that here!

    I just checked however, prices have come down. Surprising.

    Think I'll continue holding off until AM5, don't want to waste anymore money on my AM4 setup (3600 with B550 board).
    Last edited by theriddick; 08 September 2021, 11:48 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • jaxa
    replied
    Originally posted by GreenReaper View Post
    I'm looking to buy one of the 6000-series APUs when they come out, because RDNA2 promises increased power efficiency and I figure this'll help it get the best out of the limited power budget - plus I understand it has raytracing support (I don't expect much, just console tech parity). However, I'm concerned that this will be undermined by lack of AV1 decode (even if vector-based software decode has gotten a lot better).
    If it doesn't have AV1 decode, I'm not buying it. Simple as that.

    Leave a comment:


  • GreenReaper
    replied
    I'm looking to buy one of the 6000-series APUs when they come out, because RDNA2 promises increased power efficiency and I figure this'll help it get the best out of the limited power budget - plus I understand it has raytracing support (I don't expect much, just console tech parity). However, I'm concerned that this will be undermined by lack of AV1 decode (even if vector-based software decode has gotten a lot better).

    Still, the graphics support in the 5000s would be good enough for the majority of people. True gamers are always going to be able to do better going discrete and will likely be willing to pay the various costs for that.
    Last edited by GreenReaper; 08 September 2021, 10:00 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • wertigon
    replied
    Originally posted by brucethemoose View Post
    Fast memory is also quite a pricey addition to what's ostensibly a budget build, depending on how high you go.
    Demonstrably false. Here is a quick budget build from PCPartPicker, price total is ~$800:
    • CPU: 5700G
    • Motherboard: Aorus B550M Pro-P
    • Memory: 2x8 GB Corsair Vengeance Black LPX 3200 MHz
    • Storage: Kingston A2000 1TB
    • Case: Cooler Master MasterBox Q300L
    • PSU: Seasonic Focus 650W Gold
    Sure, not the best but it'll get 1080p gaming at RX 560 levels (yes 560 not 5600) done for a relatively cheap penny, and adding a $300-$500 GPU once prices are better in a year is not hard.

    Leave a comment:


  • Citan
    replied
    Originally posted by QwertyChouskie View Post

    Given that it's super hard to get any dGPU nowadays, its useful for anyone wanting to build a gaming PC. They can build with an APU for now, and have a great CPU while having just enough GPU for causal/esports games, and put in a dGPU later down the line when they can actually get one.

    Also, if you have your memory running at good speeds, the performance will be noticeably higher. AFAICT NotebookCheck was just quoting Userbenchmark numbers for an OEM build, and OEM build are famous for cheap single-channel RAM, therefore the performance might be much lower in those benchmarks than the chip is actually capable of.
    This.

    Or... Just wanting to build a good home/work mixed computer with a CPU that boasts good enough perfs to last decently (read: non-intel) in a small form factor, and just want enough GPU power to support dual/triple screen for your daily missions.

    Leave a comment:


  • Inopia
    replied
    Originally posted by brucethemoose View Post
    Fast memory is also quite a pricey addition to what's ostensibly a budget build, depending on how high you go.
    You can get pretty good ram at just slightly higher price than the manufacturer recommended ram. With Zen3 you're not going to get Infinity Fabric past 2000MHz unless you win the silicon lottery and buy an expensive motherboard so that's pretty much the speed you need to hit with your ram. Many 3600MHz sticks can do the 4000MHz if you raise their voltage and then it's just hunting for low timings and possibly dual banking. Dual banked 16GiB kits are hard to find but 32GiB kits are pretty much all dual banked, good thing I have use for that.

    This was my analysis when Zen 3 released and I tried to optimize my build value so it might be a bit outdated.

    Leave a comment:


  • pal666
    replied
    Originally posted by brucethemoose View Post
    A used GTX 950 (or AMD equivalent) is below $100
    here it's below $200. and with $300 5600g you also get fast cpu

    Leave a comment:


  • pal666
    replied
    Originally posted by brucethemoose View Post
    pretty much *any* dGPU you can find is faster
    well, it's not easy to find any dgpu these days

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X