Originally posted by r1348
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Intel Core i7 1165G7 Tiger Lake vs. AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U Linux Performance
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by antonyshen View PostI want one of these AMD laptops, but I want them offer non-soldered RAM slots and other possible storage expansion capbilities.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bug77 View Post
Lenovo used to have that either (at least for their T series). Have they stopped offering that?
Now it is the L-series that is the only seried with no nonsoldered RAM (unless you go for the ThinkPad L Yoga devices, which also do not feature nonsoldered RAM).
Comment
-
Originally posted by bug77 View PostThe tide has completely turned. Intel used to have the more powerful CPU with a weaker GPU, now it's the other way around (though the difference between GPUs isn't as big as it used to be).
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by r1348 View Post
I feel dirty by saying it, but have a look at HP Elitebook lineup. They might not offer Lenovo's linux support, but they do have expandable RAM and storage options.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wizard69 View Post
My problem with laptops is that they don't last!!!! As such older RAM isn't a concern, just buy the RAM you need, that will last the length of the warranty. Since on average that is less than two years one should be able to get the RAM allocation right. What hurts the most though is storage expansion, laptops never seem to have enough.
Those also tend to have a physical ram slot, because they just solder 4 gigs onboard to cut costs, then have 4, 8 and 12 gb options. You can put a 16 gig stick in there, get yourself 20 gigs of ram. Yes, more than half of it will run single channel performance, but the impact is not all that severe, plus for use cases that actually need that much ram, more single channel memory is immensely better than swapping, even on a fast m2 nvme drive.
Decent chance zen 3 mobile apus will support 32 gig sticks as well, and hopefully, they will move onto soldering a base 8 gigs, at least on 8 core systems, so say hello to 40 gigs of ram possible on an affordable laptop, that will not fall behind from could put in a desktop tower 10 years ago.
The big issue with those laptops is the display - it seems like laptop makers are still sucking up to intel, even when they have a better option now, and keep the bright and accurate displays 99% exclusive to intel systems. Shame!
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by polarathene View Post
When I read that, I was like "wtf is CVML, never heard of such, are those roman numerals?...1155 kinda, wut". CV and ML accel just never clicked until you clarified afterwards.
So they're getting something like nvidias tensor cores, or like SoCs with NPUs? (maybe they're the same thing I dunno)
ASIC acceleration has been the "secret" behind apple's advantage over other ARM chips, the problem with it is that the design is constrained quite a lot, and yes it does accelerate audio, video, image and crypto, but it does so in a rather walled way - as a developer you are basically limited to what apple wants to allow you to do explicitly, rather than full hardware access. So it only supports a select few formats, algorithms and operations, and you are stuck with those. If you throw general purpose compute code at it, it is more or less in the same ballpark as 3rd party high end ARM chips, just a tiny tad better due to the slightly better memory subsystem, which was necessary to be able to simultaneously feed both the cpu and the fairly high throughput accelerators.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by wizard69 View Post
My problem with laptops is that they don't last!!!! As such older RAM isn't a concern, just buy the RAM you need, that will last the length of the warranty. Since on average that is less than two years one should be able to get the RAM allocation right. What hurts the most though is storage expansion, laptops never seem to have enough.
I'll admit that when I got a more deskbound job, I switched to an ultraportable - which sadly is a lot less sturdy, so I understand your point if you are talking about ~1KG ultrathin efforts.
As for storage, I'll agree there; flexibility in storage is one of the requirements I impose on looking at new systems. The old workstation laptop could take two M.2 drives (one NVMe, one SATA) and two 2.5" drives (7mm max for one, 9.5mm max for second). The ultraportable is something of a rarity, having two PCI-E M.2 slots. Sadly half the RAM is soldered, which isn't ideal, though.
Comment
Comment