Judging by past experience of the way AMD devs (remember opensource ?!), and Linux devs incorporate (good drivers, features, ...) for Linux into this AMD Ryzen 5000 series cpu's, the "average" user is looking at maybe November 2021 or later for Linux to incorporate full performance advantage of these 5000 series ryzen cpu's, ..., whereas MS Windows users will have all these issues sorted out 8 months earlier.
But, of course by then, Zen 4 will be upon us, ...., and Linux will be adivised to rinse n repeat n wait, again.
But that's ok, 'cause when it happens again, and again, and ..., Linux will always blame the private-corporate, patent-pending, copyright, ..., world for letting Linux users down, blah blah ..., and they'll BOTH be correct.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AMD Ryzen 5000 Series (Zen 3) Linux Expectations - Should Be Good But No "Znver3" Compiler Yet
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by geearf View PostCan't znver3 be added to a minor release of GCC if it's not too much of a change? That way it shouldn't take that long to go.
Leave a comment:
-
Can't znver3 be added to a minor release of GCC if it's not too much of a change? That way it shouldn't take that long to go.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by oleid View Post
-march=XYZ will imply -mtune=XYZ
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zxy_thf View PostIf I understand compiler's optimization flags correctly, -march=native would use all instructions supported by the current processor, and -mtune=... will use micro-arch specific instruction scheduler.
-march doesn't need any change, but -mtune=, maybe?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AsuMagic View Post
iirc -mtune is implied by -march, which makes sense.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zxy_thf View PostIf I understand compiler's optimization flags correctly, -march=native would use all instructions supported by the current processor, and -mtune=... will use micro-arch specific instruction scheduler.
-march doesn't need any change, but -mtune=, maybe?
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Who came up with names like znver2, znver3 instead of using zen2, zen3 etc.?
- Likes 3
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by oleid View Post
Probably znver2 will do just fine. I'm wondering, though, what -march=native would do.
-march doesn't need any change, but -mtune=, maybe?
Leave a comment:
-
znver2 might be really sufficent up to now - it seems that zen 3 is a highly opzimized and almost completly restructured zen 2 so afaik instructionset etc is the same.
sry german:
https://www.computerbase.de/2020-10/...-ankuendigung/Last edited by CochainComplex; 08 October 2020, 04:49 PM.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: