Originally posted by torsionbar28
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Intel Xeon vs. AMD EPYC Performance On The Linux 5.8 Kernel
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by DooMMasteR View PostFor me, not really, there are fans, that are similarly silent, but none are as consistent and none of them are as enduring, literally still running 80mm fans from ~2007, and they are still running like day one, 24/7 since then.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Because there is an I in intel and intel "can't give us the cores" can you also show uno epyc 7002 numbers ?
I see mobo boards that only allow one 7002 epyc cpu.
echostream 36x m2 nvme drive motherboard and gigabyte gigabyte mz32-ar0mz, etc, etc....
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by atomsymbol
I see on the photo that you are using Noctua fans. Is there any discernible difference in noise between Noctua self-stabilizing oil-pressure bearings and other types of bearings also claimed to be relatively silent?
My experience is they will instantly become hair driers if they're running at full speed (>1500rpm for 12" case fans and >3000 rpm for the NH-U9S CPU fan).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by atomsymbol
I see on the photo that you are using Noctua fans. Is there any discernible difference in noise between Noctua self-stabilizing oil-pressure bearings and other types of bearings also claimed to be relatively silent?
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Intel Xeon vs. AMD EPYC Performance On The Linux 5.8 Kernel
Phoronix: Intel Xeon vs. AMD EPYC Performance On The Linux 5.8 Kernel
Given that Ubuntu 20.10 will be shipping with Linux 5.8 out-of-the-box along with other autumn 2020 Linux distributions where Linux 5.9 is landing too late, here is a fresh comparison of several different AMD EPYC 7002 "Rome" and Intel Xeon "Cascade Lake" processors on this current stable kernel release for seeing how the performance is standing up as we approach this next round of Linux distribution releases.
Tags: None
Leave a comment: